Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Since each time after the person gets off the scale, the reading is 2 lb the person's weight must be near the mean of
148-2, 151-2, 150-2, 152-2; that is to say, near the mean of 146, 149, 148, 150 = (146+149+148+150)/4 = 148.25
We could estimate the uncertainty as <em>the standard error SE
</em>
where
<em>s = standard deviation of the sample
</em>
<em>n = 4 sample size.
</em>
Computing s:
So, the uncertainty is 1.479/2 = 0.736
<em>It is not possible to estimate the bias, since it is the difference between the true weight and the mean, but we do not know the true weight.
</em>
Answer: The 2nd one on your right
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Option B: x > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Option A is wrong because
will be 0. So, the inequality can't be divided by 0.
Option C is wrong because 1 will suffice this inequality. 
Option D is wrong because any value in the root has to be greater or equal to 0 (otherwise, it's imaginary number). -1 will give the latter root a value of root-(-3).
Leaving us with only option B, which is the right answer.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
She has enough money because 7% tax on a 10.00$ item would be 7% of 10.00$ which is 70 cents.