Answer:
The kinetic energy of a moving object is directly proportional to its mass and directly proportional to the square of its velocity.
Explanation:
Even when asymptomatic, the virus can still be actively multiplying and killing cells in the immune system that help fight pathogens. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a
virus?</h3>
Generally, the virus is simply defined as a virus consisting of a core of genetic information, either DNA or RNA, wrapped by a capsid, which is a protective covering formed of protein.
In conclusion, It is possible for the virus to be actively reproducing and destroying immune cells even in the absence of any outward symptoms.
Read more about the virus
brainly.com/question/25859411
#SPJ1
Answer:
<em>B and C.</em>
Explanation:
The epidemiological triangle is an illustration of interaction among suitable hosts, disease agents, and the environment that drives successful outbreak of diseases.
In order to successfully tackle or reduce the incidence of a disease, the triangle has to be broken.
<em>In the case of malaria which is caused by plasmodium but spread through the female anopheles mosquito, one way of breaking the epidemiological triangle is to eliminate female anopheles mosquito in the environment using any possible means. This will stop the spread of the parasite and hence, the disease.</em>
<em>Another way to reduce/prevent malaria is to prevent the vector, female anopheles mosquito from getting to the host, the human populace. This can also be achieved by several possible means.</em>
Relocating the entire village to a neighbouring village might not break the epidemiological triangle as long as female anopheles mosquito still abounds. In the same vein, antibacterial drugs will not help to treat malaria. However, instructing residents on personal protective measures and controlling the vector through chemical larvicides will go a long way in breaking the triangle and reducing the incidence on the malaria disease.
<em>The correct options is B and C.</em>
Its the second option....................................... :)
Without the greenhouse effect, there would be more ice on Earth’s surface. The answer is B.
