Rutherford's model did not completely reimagine Thomson's. Like Thomson, Rutherford still believed that atoms contained negatively charged electrons. Unlike the plum pudding model, where those atoms simply floated in "soup," Rutherford believed they orbited the central nucleus just as planets orbit the sun.
The lInk is below for anymore help on this question :
https://education.seattlepi.com/differences-between-plum-pudding-model-planetary-mod...
It’s okay we can be friends :)
B would be your right answer. Because Jupiter’s gravity pull is much stronger than earths
Answer:
1 second later the vehicle's velocity will be:
![v(1)= 6\,\,\frac{m}{s} \\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=v%281%29%3D%206%5C%2C%5C%2C%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5C%5C)
5 seconds later the vehicle's velocity will be:
![v(5)=14\,\,\frac{m}{s}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=v%285%29%3D14%5C%2C%5C%2C%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D)
Explanation:
Recall the formula for the velocity of an object under constant accelerated motion (with acceleration "
"):
![v(t)=v_0+a\,t](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=v%28t%29%3Dv_0%2Ba%5C%2Ct)
Therefore, in this case
and ![a=2\,\,\frac{m}{s^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a%3D2%5C%2C%5C%2C%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%5E2%7D)
so we can estimate the velocity of the vehicle at different times just by replacing the requested "t" in the expression:
![v(t)=v_0+a\,t\\v(t)=4+2\,\,t\\v(1)=4+2\,(1) = 6\,\,\frac{m}{s} \\v(5)=4+2\,(5)=14\,\,\frac{m}{s}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=v%28t%29%3Dv_0%2Ba%5C%2Ct%5C%5Cv%28t%29%3D4%2B2%5C%2C%5C%2Ct%5C%5Cv%281%29%3D4%2B2%5C%2C%281%29%20%3D%206%5C%2C%5C%2C%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D%20%5C%5Cv%285%29%3D4%2B2%5C%2C%285%29%3D14%5C%2C%5C%2C%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%7D)