Theoretical probability:
1 ... (16 and 2/3) %
2 ... (16 and 2/3) %
3 ... (16 and 2/3) %
4 ... (16 and 2/3) %
5 ... (16 and 2/3) %
6 ... (16 and 2/3) %
Experimental results:
1 ... 18
2 ... 16
3 ... 16
4 ... 17
5 ... 16
6 ... 17
The total number of rolls in the experiment was
(18 + 16 + 16 + 17 + 16 + 17) = 100
so the expected frequency for each outcome was 16-2/3 times,
and the SIMULATION probabilities were
1 ... 18%
2 ... 16%
3 ... 16%
4 ... 17%
5 ... 16%
6 ... 17%
To me, this looks fantastically close. The cube
could hardly be more fair than it actually is.
The answer to the missing value is X = 3
Answer: 363
Step-by-step explanation:
The common difference is 7, so the explicit formula is 
.
Substituting in n=66,
X+1 is the answer for this question
Answer:
Option 2 would be the better deal, as long as they would only pay $ 87.37 for the smart TV.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine which deal is better before taxes, the aforementioned discounts must be made at the original prices and their results compared, through the following calculations:
1)
320 - (320 x 15/100) = X
320 - 48 = X
272 = X
2)
349.49 - (349.49 x 75/100) = X
349.49 - 262.11 = X
87.37 = X
3)
280 = X
Therefore, as can be seen, option 2 would be the better deal, as long as they would only pay $ 87.37 for the smart TV.
