The second option is correct, I,e what you've chosen
Answer:
We conclude that the machine is under filling the bags.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = 436.0 gram
Sample mean,
= 429.0 grams
Sample size, n = 40
Alpha, α = 0.05
Population standard deviation, σ = 23.0 grams
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
We use one-tailed(left) z test to perform this hypothesis.
Formula:
Putting all the values, we have
Now,
Since,
We reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis. Thus, we conclude that the machine is under filling the bags.
Micah spent 28.10 dollars, Jeremy spent 34.82 dollars
ANSWER
See attachment
EXPLANATION
The given inequality is
![|x| \: > \: \frac{3}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7Cx%7C%20%5C%3A%20%3E%20%5C%3A%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%20)
This implies that,
![x\: > \: \frac{3}{2} \: or \: - x\: > \: \frac{3}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20x%5C%3A%20%3E%20%5C%3A%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%20%5C%3A%20or%20%5C%3A%20-%20x%5C%3A%20%3E%20%5C%3A%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%20)
Multiply both sides of the second inequality by -1 and reverse the inequality sign.
![x\: > \: \frac{3}{2} \: or \: x\: < \: - \frac{3}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20x%5C%3A%20%3E%20%5C%3A%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%20%5C%3A%20or%20%5C%3A%20x%5C%3A%20%3C%20%5C%3A%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%20)
The graphical solution to this inequality is shown in the attachment.
Answer: helllloooooooooooooo000000oooo
Step-by-step explanation: