Answer:
<em>it causes sickness</em>
Explanation:
<em> i got it right on edge 2021</em>
The answer is "Yes. It is often appropriate to praise the losers of a competition."
Competition is far superior for the loser in my estimation than the champ, given the right attitude. Losing is transitory. Much the same as winning is and simply as is life. With regards to time we can value the fleeting idea of any lose and discover the exercise.
Answer:
The correct option is D: taking the cost into account because money spent on pollution reduction is not available for other worthy activities
Explanation:
According to Lawrence Summers analysis, every spend for healthcare needs to be beneficial to the economy at the lowest possible cost. Hence looking at it from his point of view, it would be more moral to reduce pollution, looking at the cost of doing this. This is because there are other aspects that need money and if this money is spent on pollution without considering other areas, then there would not be enough money available for other worthy activities.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
I had the same question before
