Answer:
His ears popping
Explanation:
Conditioned response: In psychology, the term "conditioned response" is described as one of the different parts in the "classical conditioning theory" and is also written as "CR". The theory of classical conditioning was determined by a psychologist named Ivan Pavlov while he was conducting a small experiment in his laboratory on dogs.
A conditioned response is referred to as an organism's behavior that doesn't come out naturally yet it can be leaned by the organisms via the pairing of a "neutral stimulus" with a "potent stimulus" or "unconditioned stimulus".
In the question above, the given statement signifies conditioned response as "his ear-popping".
The region that's most likely at risk for a tornado is Tornado Alley. Tornado Alley consists of these U.S. states: Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, South Dakota, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Nebraska, Colorado, North Dakota, and Minnesota. These states unfortunately are at the most risk of tornadoes. This is because the region allows cold air (from Canada) meet with moist and warm air (from the Gulf of Mexico), so it's soon in between two the air-masses that most tornadoes eventually form.
The region most at risk for hurricanes are states along the South; the most common places at risk are Texas, Florida, and Louisiana. You're more likely to get hit by a hurricane in these states. This is because of the mere influence from low pressure systems that cause high wind speeds on tropical systems.
Industrialization went hand in hand with democratic institutions and respect for private property. To the extent working people constituted a unified block of voters, they had to be listened to.
<span>Now, let me ask you a question: What does your question really ask? That is to say, what do you mean by "the major industrial nations of the west"? In what way are they different from the "working people" who live in them? Or, do you think that all John D. Rockefeller did was sit around all day and let money flow into his pocket like honey from a pot? Guys like E.H. Harriman worked very, very hard. So, does your question really make any sense?</span>
The correct answer is B. FALSE
Under the principles discussed in "A Sample Court Case," United States v. Jones, the court is most likely to rule that the officers' installation of the device was not a search because the officers did not obtain a warrant. Chris's argument was right; there should be a warrant presented for it to be considered as a lawful search.
