Here are the steps
1: Put the compass on Q and make the width equal to the distance from Q to L. Extend line LM towards the left side of L and draw an arc hitting the line segment on the left side of L
2. <span> Without changing the width and position of the compass, draw an arc between L and M.
3. Without changing the width of the compass, put the compass on the point of intersection of the arc and line LM (left side of L). Draw an arc above line LM.
4. Without changing the width of the compass, put the compass on the point of intersection of the arc and line LM (right side of L). Draw an arc above line LM.
5. Use a straight edge to make a line from the intersection of the two arcs above line LM to Q intersecting through L along the way. </span>
Answer:
So then our significance level is 
and we need to remember these two conditions:
1) If the p value 
we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the significance level given
2) If the p value 
we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis at the significance level given
And baed on the options we see that the only possibility would be:
d. 0.015
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to know for which value we would REJECT the null hypothesis.
So then our significance level is and we need to remember these two conditions:
1) If the p value we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at the significance level given
2) If the p value we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis at the significance level given
And baed on the options we see that the only possibility would be:
d. 0.015
30% off an item would make that item valued at 70% of its original price
94 times 0.7 = 65.8
$65.80
Answer:
You can opt to study the entire population when the population is well defined(Complete sampling frame) and small.
It can eliminate any potential bias occurring through sampling technique, but other than that it is really not justified to consume more resources and time.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
