Based on the fact that Kay Company will use direct labor hours as its overhead allocation base, the overhead for a product with 5 labor hours is $228.
<h3>What is the overhead assigned to the product?</h3>
This can be found as:
= Total overhead cost / Number of labor hours x Product labor hours
Solving gives:
= 4,104,000 / 90,000 x 5
= 45.6 x 5
= $228
Find out more on assigning overhead costs at brainly.com/question/22812280.
#SPJ1
To create a balanced budget, one must balance needs against wants.
In order to Create a balanced budget you should:
<span>1. Keep track of your </span>financial gain<span> and expenses.</span>
<span>2. Stay on </span>top<span> of your monthly bills.</span>
<span>3. Be </span>ready<span> for </span>surprising<span> expenses.</span>
4. Not overspend.
<span>5. Figure out </span>what quantity you wish to save lots of to satisfy your monetary goals.
The boy scouts, the veterans of foreign wars, most civic organizations, and many groups that people join because of mutual interest are all examples of voluntary associations. They worked together as volunteers in a form of union or agreement working together for a unified purpose or mutual interest.
Answer:
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Explanation:
Is necessary to consider different amount of suppliers and evaluate the cost. We will choose the number of suppliers which offers a lower cost.
- EMV1 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk + cost of managing supplier = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05+16000 = 9600 + 24000 + 16000 = $ 49600
- EMV2 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk of each supplier*unique event risk of each supplier + cost of managing 2 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 1200 + 16000*2 = $ 42800
- EMV3 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of managing 3 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 16000*3 = $ 57600
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Less than 0 for a linear trend, because the trend is no longer a trend but a FAD.