Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
First, suppose that nothing has changed, and possibility p is still 0.56. It's our null hypothesis. Now, we've got Bernoulli distribution, but 30 is big enough to consider Gaussian distribution instead.
It has mean μ= np = 30×0.56=16.8
standard deviation s = √npq
sqrt(30×0.56×(1-0.56)) = 2.71
So 21 is (21-16.8)/2.71 = 1.5494 standard deviations above the mean. So the level increased with a ˜ 0.005 level of significance, and there is sufficient evidence.
Answer:
The correct option is;
Because the vertical line intercepted the graph more than once, the graph is of a relation, but it is not a function
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a function maps a given value of the input variable, to the output variable, we have that a relation that has two values of the dependent variable, for a given dependent variable is not a function
Therefore, a graph in which at one given value of the input variable, x, there are two values of the output variable y is not a graph of a function
With the vertical line test, if a vertical line drawn at any suitable location on the graph, intercepts the graph at more than two points, then the relationship shown on the graph is not a function.
<u>Answer:</u>
x = -3/7
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
We are given the following equation for which we have to solve for x:
So we will start by expanding the equation by multiplying the common factor with the brackets to get:
Arranging the like terms together (variables on one side of the equation and constants on the other side) to get:
Therefore, x = -3/7.
Take 3/5 of 485 you got it
