1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
2 years ago
12

The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution says that when state laws conflict with federal law, State law wins out or takes pre

cedence. (T/F)?
True
False
Law
2 answers:
GuDViN [60]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

false

Explanation:

sammy [17]2 years ago
3 0
False because Federal Law preempts State Law, even when the laws conflict. So the Federal Court may require a state to stop certain behavior it believes interferes with Federal Law.

I Hope This Helps! (^_^)
You might be interested in
4. Under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975:
Nady [450]
A Is the correct answer the law protects any discrimination against older workers unless they have a contract saying you must retire
3 0
3 years ago
A Supreme Court justice who agrees with the majority in a case, but disagrees in whole
igomit [66]

Answer:

concurring

Explanation:

a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.

3 0
2 years ago
The law of mass action states that _____. Select all the options that complete the sentence correctly.
notka56 [123]

Answer: a chemical system reaches a state where the concentrations of reactants and products is a constant ratioequilibrium can be reached from any direction, i.e., by beginning with a mixture of reactants or products, or both

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
If you can do it please help me if you can do some it’s OK if you can’t do all !!
defon

Answer:

wow that is a lot to take in all at once all tho if you want i can explain it then u can answer it cool let me know

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How does the right to a grand jury protect the rights of the accused
romanna [79]

Answer:

It requires sufficient evidence before moving to trial in cases of serious crimes.

Explanation:

As you may already know the court by Jurí is responsible for judging malicious crimes against life. In this type of court, it is up to a popular panel - the jury drawn to make up the sentencing council - to declare whether the crime in question has happened and whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. This type of trial is very important and protects the rights of the accused, as the case must be explained to the jury in a very detailed manner, explaining all the evidence. Thus, it is more difficult for the accused to be unjustly convicted.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In assessing the tort of defamation, the courts must seek a balance between the right to protect one's reputation with the right
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the role of an expert witness and be sure to identify what the expert witness should not do.
    6·1 answer
  • 2. How is it possible for citizens from two different countries to see the same thing and interpret it
    10·1 answer
  • QUESTIONS:
    13·1 answer
  • Help please- I’ll luv you forever
    13·1 answer
  • The rules an agency within the executive branch makes are called:
    6·1 answer
  • Which type of court system functions to determine the liability of the defendant?
    8·1 answer
  • 2. What is national consensus?
    15·1 answer
  • What factors are used to determine probable cause?
    14·1 answer
  • The decisions of the federal courts are primarily driven by legal doctrine or individual judges’ political ideology?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!