1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
2 years ago
12

The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution says that when state laws conflict with federal law, State law wins out or takes pre

cedence. (T/F)?
True
False
Law
2 answers:
GuDViN [60]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

false

Explanation:

sammy [17]2 years ago
3 0
False because Federal Law preempts State Law, even when the laws conflict. So the Federal Court may require a state to stop certain behavior it believes interferes with Federal Law.

I Hope This Helps! (^_^)
You might be interested in
Why do community report the crime instead of taking it in their own hands<br>​
laila [671]

Answer:

Communities will perhaps rather report a crime instead of "taking things into their own hands," because they want to avoid conflict or may have no true interest in what they're reporting.

Explanation:

^

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. दिए गए शब्दों में से उचित शब्द का प्रयोग करके रिक्त स्थानों की पूर्ति करें - यह______विद्यालय है।
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

(c) mine

Explanation:

Fill in the blanks using the appropriate word from the given words - it is ______ school.

1 point

(A) me.

(B) vote.

(C) mine.

(D) choice.

6 0
3 years ago
(someone help. I need to know what you guys think of this meme)​
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

very good

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which application of forensic DNA typing analysis dispute paternity cases predominate
Law Incorporation [45]

Forensic DNA is common in murder cases

6 0
3 years ago
Raymond Zukaitis was a physician practicing medicine in Douglas County, Nebraska. Aetna issued a policy of professional liabilit
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you think the right to veto rules or laws helped the<br> common people of Rome?
    13·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo puedo relacionar la película de los juicios de Nuremberg, con mi carrera de abogado?
    5·1 answer
  • What are representatives in republican government supposed to do? ​
    8·1 answer
  • Thank you to whoever is able to help me ​
    9·1 answer
  • What are four kinds of assistance Missouri gives to voters who need it? <br> -am. Gov.
    15·1 answer
  • All the news stations start reporting that a person in public office is accepting money in exchange for his vote in the legislat
    8·1 answer
  • Why am i simping on anime girls
    6·2 answers
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all Woros
    11·1 answer
  • Personal degradation of a dependent adult was added in:<br> A. 1995<br> B. 1983<br> C. 2017
    5·1 answer
  • a man is accused of holding up a liquor store and stealing hundreds of dollars from the cash register. where is this case heard
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!