Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
B false
Explanation:
because if it was a professional robbee he would not have been caught before or have a prior arrest record
Answer:
On Monday December 2nd human remains were discovered in Griffith Park Monday, prompting a homicide investigation, according to police. So far there is no suspects involved. The outcome will mist likely be that they will most likely find a suspect that commited the crime.
Explanation:
The Article I found this from is
<u>Decapitated body found in Griffith Park prompts investigation</u>
