Since there are 52 weeks in a year, do 325,563 divided by 52 which is 6,260.826923076923 babies per week
This can round to 6260 babies per week since if you round up, your making up nonexistent babies
Polynomials are <em>algebraic</em> expressions whose <em>standard</em> form is defined below:
The expression p(x) = - 13 represents a <em>zeroeth</em> polynomial.
<h3>What is a polynomial?</h3>
Herein we must present what the form of polynomials are. Polynomials are <em>algebraic</em> expressions whose <em>standard</em> form is defined below:
(1)
Where:
- i-th coefficient- n - Grade
- x - Independent variable
An example is the expression p(x) = - 13, <em>real </em>numbers can be define as <em>zeroeth</em> polynomials. In this regard, the example can be seen as:
p(x) = 0 · xⁿ + 0 · xⁿ⁻¹ + ... + 0 · x² + 0 · x - 13
<h3>Remark</h3>
The statement is incomplete. We decided to re-define the statement to what polynomials are.
To learn more on polynomials: brainly.com/question/11536910
#SPJ1
So, to set up your equation is the hardest part. If you remember the basic format, you're set.
I(t) = P * (1+r%)^t
t= time and this will be our variable
Initial amount P = $2740
Rate = 4.3% which converts numerically into .043
I(t) = 7000
Before we get to find out how to find how many years it takes to get to $7000, set up the basic equation by plugging in what we know.
I(t) = $2740(1+4.3%)^t
I(t)=2740(1.043)^t
Now plug in for $7000 for I(t)
7000=2740(1.043)^t Divide both sides by 2740
7000/2740 = 2740/2740(1.043)^t
2.55474453=(1.043)^t
Now you can solve for t in two ways. You can either use the natural log or graph it on your graphing calculate and see when the two equations meet.
In your calculator you can set up:
ln(2.55474453)/ln(1.043) = t which is the method I prefer since it's much simpler
t=22.278528
but you can also graph it in your ti-84
with
y1=2.55474453
y2=(1.043)^x
and find where they intersect on the graph.
either way it'll be the same answer
I don’t think this is algebra 2 but ok
37
I used the formula (32°F − 32) × 5/9 = 0°C (but ofc replaced the numbers with 99)
Yeah and i rounded 98.6 to 99. 99 Fahrenheit is 37.2222... so i rounded it down to 37. So i think the answer is 37.
