His veto<span> may be over-ridden by a two-thirds vote in each chamber, and permitting ten days to pass without signing an act is considered as acquiescence and it is promulgated by congress.</span><span>
</span>
Well I can't see the possible sentences, but muslims were a minority in India at the time and the population was predominantly Hindu. Forcing the majority of the population to change their religion forcibly (and through that many of their core values, beliefs, traditions and practices) was a quick way to create political unrest which could lead to a revolution. They we're already a minority ruling a large and powerful nation, so they were already dealing with a lot of resistance from the population as it was. Maybe they wanted to practice tolerance for moral reasons, but more likely they just didn't want to push their luck when they were already struggling to remain popular.
A because all the action is there
Answer:
The correct option here is the third option.
Explanation:
Roosevelt's philosophy refers to his use of diplomacy and military force in the states foreign affairs. In his opinion the big military force, in this specific case a big navy, was instrumental as it would make other states listen closely what the US were saying. The big military would allow the US to be more secure in its foreign policy and would be able to protect itself. That is why Roosevelt would oppose the reducing the size of the American forces.
