Answer:
The collapse of the World trade center APEX
Explanation:
Answer:
Situational irony is when the expected action or response does not happen in reality. But, the opposite happens. In the passage: “Most of the aunt’s remarks seemed to begin with ‘Don’t,’ and nearly all of the children’s remarks began with ‘Why?’” is the situational irony.
The points that state the situational irony are:
The dialogues of the aunt and the children are given significance among the other characters.
All the other lines focus on the reaction of the characters after the story is narrated.
There is a sense of opposition between the aunt and the children.
Thus, the uncompromising attitude is conveyed through the word, ‘Why?’. The expectations that the aunt had on the children does not work out.
Answer: The Guru proves to be a wise man who thought about the people and their unfair lifestyle. The king was nothing but an irrational and cruel ruler who wanted to sacrifice someone at all costs. Therefore, values determine the character since they can be hated or loved by the people for their actions or behaviors.
Explanation: When an irrational sacrifice was occurring and the cruel king was looking for a culprit, the Guru decided to preach his knowledge, making the king understand a valuable lesson. Values can determine how respected or hated a person be. When the king passed, the Guru was chosen to be the next king due to his noble values, and the end of the king's kingdom was only seen as a dark chapter in people's life.
This question is about Reparations for slavery in the United States
Answer:
B.Victims who received reparations in the past suffered the injustices firsthand; the descendants of enslaved people did not.
Explanation:
Slavery reparation is an established practice in the USA that sought to secure compensation for freed slaves and who are still seeking to extend this compensation to their descendants. Although the first indemnities were given in the form of a pension, nowadays this indemnity is proposed in different ways and may be a sum of money, scholarships, agreements, tax exemptions, among others.
This practice is very controversial today, because many claim that the victims of slavery deserved reparation because they suffered injustices directly, first hand; however, their descendants do not.
