Answer:
yes
Explanation:
I think that their punishment should be harsher because they are expected to do the right thing in the positions that are given to them so if they disobey they should be punish severely because they are not above the law.
Answer:
in my opinion i think false
Explanation:
i think with more black officers it would lower the rate of assult crimes
Answer: Um sorry for wasting your answeres but whats the question.
Explanation:
The attorney-client privilege protects most communications between clients and their lawyers. But, according to the crime-fraud exception to the privilege, a client's communication to her attorney isn't privileged if she made it with the intention of committing or covering up a crime or fraud.
The attorney-client privilege protects from disclosure to third parties: (a) confidential communications; (b) between an attorney and client; (c) made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice. Unless all three of these prongs are met, the communication is not privileged.
Wreckorp wants to maintain an exclusivity image and limits its distribution to 100 stores in each region. it is Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided.
<h3>Are Wreckorp's actions illegal?</h3>
We cannot say if Wreckorp's actions are legal or illegal because the information provided does not give the full facts.
The actions of Wreckorp may be legal if no monpolistic agenda is going on but it could be illegal if this is the case. More information is therefore needed to make a proper assessment.
Options for this question include:
- Strictly illegal
- Strictly legal.
- it is Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided
Find out more on the legality of business actions at brainly.com/question/4556120.
#SPJ1
