1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gwar [14]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following symbols did the Sioux believe protected them from natural and supernatural forces? a. heron b. eagle c. t

hunderbird d. owl
History
2 answers:
Gemiola [76]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:The correct answer is C: thunderbird

Explanation:The Sioux nation believed that this type of symbol, represented through the thunderbird, gave them special protection against all kinds of demonic possessions or supernatural entities. According to the Lakotas, as they were also known, there were several types of thunderbirds which were large birds and the sounds they emitted were very similar to those produced by thunder, which is why they have this name. The strength of this bird was so huge that it is considered a sacred symbol of nature.

MrMuchimi3 years ago
3 0
The symbol that was known to be called "thunder bird" was when the <span>Sioux believe protected them from natural and supernatural forces</span>
You might be interested in
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which government agency controlled the use of valuable resources including oil, metal, and rubber during World War II? the Defen
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

The war production board

8 0
4 years ago
Which statement describes an effect of the Arab-Israeli War of 1948?
algol13
B. Palestinians became refugees in Syria and Lebanon.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the federal government attempt to reconstruct the South after the Civil War and what was the nature of the challenges th
Hoochie [10]

they had pretty much armed soldiers around so people wouldn't treat African Americans bad but it didn't work

5 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between Tenant Farmers and Sharecroppers
bagirrra123 [75]
The difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers is:

B) Tenant Farmers owned the crops, animals and tools while sharecroppers owned nothing.

Sharecroppers had to borrow everything they needed.

ANSWER: B

Hope this helps! :)
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In what region were Semitic religions predominant?
    11·2 answers
  • Which description of the West and westward expansion is not true? A. the chance for adventure or a new life B. an easier life th
    13·2 answers
  • What influential pamphlet condemned the system of monarchy?
    14·1 answer
  • Before attacking Tenochtitlan, where did Cortés establish the first Spanish settlement in Mexico?
    5·1 answer
  • The area of the United States that was most affected by Brown v. Board of Education was
    11·2 answers
  • Why did African Americans fight to overturn segregation?
    5·2 answers
  • How did segregation affect american life in the postwar period?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of Paul Revere’s ride?
    12·1 answer
  • List three reasons behind the fall of Delhi sultanate
    11·2 answers
  • Sweeping changes are expected after march 4th [1932] explain what the tittle might mean
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!