All categories

2 years ago

How to find the mean of 2, 7, 6, 1, 9, 2, 4, 9

Mathematics

1 answer:

Lady_Fox [76]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Add the numbers together, then divide that by the amount of numbers

(2 + 7 + 6 + 1 + 9 + 2 + 4 + 9)/8

40/8 = 5

You might be interested in

What is a the gcf of 8

liraira [26]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Consider a line passing through the points A(–28, –13) and B(28, 15). Type the y-value for the point C(–24, y) to ensure that po

Nostrana [21]

Step-by-step explanation:

$\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}=\frac{15-(-13)}{28-(-28)}\\=\frac{28}{2(28)}\\\therefore\ m=\frac{1}{2}\\\frac{y-y_1}{xl-x_1}=m]\\\frac{y+13}{x+28}=\frac{1}{2}\\2y+26=x+28\\2y=x+2\\ y=\frac{1}{2}x+1$

In order to find y for point C on AB, substitute point C in line equation if AB.

$y=\frac{1}{2}(-24)+1\\\therefore y=-12+1=11\\\therefore C(-24, -11)$

7 0

3 years ago

Normal Distribution. Cherry trees in a certain orchard have heights that are normally distributed with mu = 112 inches and sigma

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

The probability that a randomly chosen tree is greater than 140 inches is 0.0228.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : Cherry trees in a certain orchard have heights that are normally distributed with $\mu = 112$ inches and $\sigma = 14$ inches.

To find : What is the probability that a randomly chosen tree is greater than 140 inches?

Solution :

Mean - $\mu = 112$ inches

Standard deviation - $\sigma = 14$ inches

The z-score formula is given by, $Z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}$

Now,

$P(X>140)=P(\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}>\frac{140-\mu}{\sigma})$

$P(X>140)=P(Z>\frac{140-112}{14})$

$P(X>140)=P(Z>\frac{28}{14})$

$P(X>140)=P(Z>2)$

$P(X>140)=1-P(Z$

The Z-score value we get is from the Z-table,

$P(X>140)=1-0.9772$

$P(X>140)=0.0228$

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen tree is greater than 140 inches is 0.0228.

5 0

3 years ago

Can u solve it?<br> Find x,y,v and u.

ikadub [295]

Explanation:

Basically, you can do it in many ways. But just, in my opinion, exactly linear algebra was made for such cases.

the optimal way is to do it with Cramer's rule.

First, find the determinant and then find the determinant x, y, v, u.

Afterward, simply divide the determinant of variables by the usual determinant.

eg. $\frac{Dx_{} }{D}$ and etc.

I think that is the best way to solve it without a hustle of myriad of calculations reducing it to row echelon form and solving with Gaussian elimination.

5 0

2 years ago

\large -\frac{2}{3}x+3=\frac{2}{3}x+\frac{1}{3}

german

Answer:

$\boxed {x = 2}$