The court case of Maryland vs. Mcculloh ruled that Congress has implied powers to create a second bank of the United States. It also ruled that Maryland could not tax the bank because they did not have the power.
The court case did not grant the Supreme Court any powers or authority of judicial review.
Answer:
Conformity
Explanation:
Conformity is the act of changing attitudes, beliefs and mind to match the ones in a group. It is the act of trying to keep to the norms of a group and therefore be part of the group instead of standing out. This is seen in what the individual above does. He does this to keep to the norms of the class even though he does not know why everyone is doing what they are doing. This is to show that conformity is as a result of social influence. Normative conformity and informational conformity are two types of conformity
Countries trade<span> with each other when, on their own, they do not have the resources, or capacity to satisfy their own needs and wants. By developing and exploiting their domestic scarce resources, </span>countries<span> can produce a surplus, and </span>trade<span> this for the resources they need.</span>
Answer:
Africa, the Americas and Asia
Answer:
The cases were about racial segregation.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education(1954) was a Supreme Court case which ruled that children's racial segregation in government's schools was illegal. The decision by the Supreme court showed that everyone is equal despite their colour or religion.
Milliken v. Bradley(1974) was a Supreme Court case in the United States regarding the outlined desegregation of busing among public school students in Detroit. There was a plan to blend students of different races in United States public schools following the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The decision was the opposite of the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education as segregation was encouraged.
The court refused to remedy unequal and separate education. Children need to learn together and understand each other. I believe voters who disagreed with the ruling could have made a peaceful protest regarding the decision made. Also, since the public schools were mainly funded by taxes, the people who opposed the decision could have refused to pay tax in order to voice their opinions on the issues.
