Answer:
i don't understand what you mean by that
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Answer:
A. To provide advance notice that formal rule making may be forthcoming
Explanation:
The Rules/Regulations by the government do not always able to be accepted directly by the citizens.
When the government is expecting such situation they tend to use informal agency actions to prepare the citizens that a certain type of law might be coming in the future.
This provide two benefits for the government:
1. The government could gauge initial reaction from the public. If they sense that it potentially lead to massive riots, they can either cancel or postpone the decision.
2. It is aimed to make the citizens prepare themselves for the upcoming law.
When a government works for the common good, it us working for the common good of the people.
