Answer:
a) Personal conflict is encouraged
Explanation:
<em>Note: from the way the question is redacted I am assuming that the question actually is "The personal values of team members on high-performing teams can be enhanced through all of the following beneficial communication practices EXCEPT" so, I'll give my personal answer based on that. </em>
<em />
The term high performing teams refers to teams or groups that are highly focused on their goals and that achieve superior business results. High-performance teams outperform all other similar teams and they outperform expectations given their composition.
Within these kind of teams all important topics are openly discussed since the main goal is to get superior results, as a consequence of this, problems that might present within the team or outside of it are proactively reported. High-performance teams have strong methods of resolving conflict efficiently, so that conflict does not become a roadblock to achieving the team's goals, however, these conflicts have to do with organization problems and not with <u>personal conflicts</u> among the members of the team.
This teams focuses too on mutual trust (trusting in other team members and trusting in the team as an entity) as well as using effective communication methods and channels by putting value in diversity.
<u>Thus, we can see that the only communication practices that do not belong to high-performing teams is: A) personal conflict is encouraged. </u>
<u />
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
Multiculturalism is defined as the existence of varied cultures and ethnic societies and identities together in mutual harmony. In multi-culture, people from different parts of the world with different backgrounds, race, religions, traditions and practices co-exits together and shares their values with each other.
This leads to an interaction of different cultural and psychological factors in the personality and minds of the individuals.
Hence the answer is TRUE.
The Boston Port Act, the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked, even more, outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally took away Massachusetts' charter and brought it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor, Parliament, or king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting a year, unless the Governor called for one. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
<span>On June 25, 1950, the </span>Korean War<span> began when North </span>Korea<span>, supported by the Soviet Union and China, invaded South </span>Korea<span>, which was supported by the </span>United States<span>. General MacArthur, leader of the </span>United<span> Nations forces, drove the North Koreans back across the divide, yet encountered a Chinese invasion.</span>
Many were poor and did not speak Spanish and for their cultural differences and isolation from the rest of Canada.
