Answer:
Multiple choices below are missing:
A) purchase Bond A
B) purchase Bond B
C) purchase neither A nor B at this time
D) negotiate a higher rate on Bond A
The correct option is A,purchase bond A.
Explanation:
By purchasing Bond A,Lee is assured interest payment of 7.5% for a period of twenty years,hence the issuer cannot call the bond if interest rate drops by 2% in order to issue a lower interest-bearing bond which would be cheaper cost-wise.
However, if Lee purchases Bond B with current coupon of 8.25%,the interest is only guaranteed for a period of two years,since the issuer has the prerogative of calling back the bond after two years should interest fall in order to issue another bond that commands lower interest rate.
Answer:
$313,288.16
Explanation:
Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows
present value can be calculated using a financial calculator
Cash flow in year 1 and 2 = 0
Cash flow in year 3 to 7 = $10,000
I = 10%
Present value = $313,288.16
To find the PV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
Answer:
Cash payments for income tax = $165000
so correct option is C. 165,000
Explanation:
given data
Income tax = $175,000
beginning tax payable = $30,000
end of the year tax payable = $40,000
to find out
Cash payments for income tax reported on the statement of cash flows
solution
we get here Cash payments for income tax that is express as
Cash payments for income tax = Income tax + beginning tax payable - end of the year tax payable ..............................1
put here value we get
Cash payments for income tax = $175000 + $30000 - $40000
Cash payments for income tax = $165000
so correct option is C. 165,000
Answer:
d. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take proper account of differences in the sizes of projects.
CORRECT As the project yields over time can differ. This generates that projects with a lower IRR can achieve a higher NPV at lower rates.
There is a crossover point after which a projects NPV are equal and from there the one with higher IRR obtains better NPV
Explanation:
a. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the time value of money.
FALSE both method consider time value of money
b. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the cost of capital
FALSE The IRR can be compared against the cost of capital to indicate wether or not a project should be preferable
.c. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR values a dollar received today the same as a dollar that will not be received until sometime in the future.
FALSE IRR considers the time value of money
e. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of cash flows over a project's full life.
FALSE it considers all the cash flows over the project's full life.
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
Given that
Total revenue is $70,000
Total fixed cost is $40,000
And, the total variable cost is $10,000
According to the given situation, the computation of profit is shown below:-
Profit = Total Revenue - Total Fixed cost - Total variable cost
= $70,000 - (10,000 × $4) - 10,000
= $70,000 - 40,000 - 10,000
= $10,000
Therefore for computing the profit we simply applied the above formula.
