In economics, the Fisher equation is used to determine the
relationship of the nominal interest rate and the real interest rate. This
equation takes into account the effect of inflation. Mathematically this is
expressed as:
Real rate = 
-1
The values given are:
Nominal rate= 10% =
0.1
Inflation=5%=0.05
Substituting known
values and by calculation:
<span>Real rate=0.0476 =
4.76%</span>
Answer:
b. $120,800.00
Explanation:
Cost of the land $ 600,000/-
Associated expenses:
Razing down the shed: $ 5000
income from scrap: $ 1000
Total expenses $ 4000
The total cost of land =600,000+4000= $ 604,000
Tax allocation: land and building $ 500,000
land allocation will be: 100,000/500,000 x$ 604,000
=0.2x604,000
=$120,800.00
Answer: the marketing costs of reaching loyal customers are typically very high
Explanation:
Brand loyalty is when a customer buys a product repeatedly from thesame company rather than buying a substitute from another company. Despite the efforts of the competitors to life them away, such customers are devoted to the product.
It should be noted that the marketing costs of reaching loyal customers are typically low. They hardly need any source of encouragement or advertisement to convince them to make their purchases.
Answer:
Option b (reflects..................settled) is the right response.
Explanation:
- The estimated beneficiary obligation was indeed unwounded by that of the identification of inflation rates through an investment that raises something both PBO reserve as well as the retirement expenditure between each duration.
- The premium on either the expected advantage commitment portion including its pension cost illustrates the amounts beyond which the pension contributions will indeed be reasonably negotiated.
Any other option is not connected to that case. That's the right choice.
Answer:
B. is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Explanation:
Mike who is a dispatch rider, decided to see his girlfriend, Jackie, who lived 50 miles off his pizza route. He had an accident while driving to his girlfriend's, and injured a pedestrian, Chuck due to his negligent driving.
Under the circumstances, Frank's Pizza isn't liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own. Mike embarking on a 50 mile drive to see his girlfriend is frolicsome and outside the scope of his employment as a delivery agent.
Hence, this will absolve his employer from any liability as he wasn't working on the designated route at the time.
