Answer:
$9.00.
Explanation:
The computation of the value of a put option is shown below:
Data provided in the question
Current price of the stock = $50
Risk free rate = 6%
Strike price = $55
Sale price = $7.20
Based on the above information
The value of put option is
Put = V - P + X exp(-r
t)
= $7.20 - $50 + $55 e
RF - 0.06(1)
= $7.20 - $50 + $51.80
= $9.00
Hence, the value of put option is $9
Answer:
Cost of goods sold =$61,5300
Gross Profit = $144,700
Explanation:
Given the information:
- Purchase : $630,000
- Purchase Returns and Allowances $25,700
- Prchases Discounts $10,900
- Freight-In $18,300
- beginning inventory of $45,000
- ending inventory of $64,600
- net sales of $760,000
As we the, the fomular for total Goods Available for Sale
=
Beginning Inventory + Purchases + Freight-In - Purchase Returns and Allowances - Purchases Discounts
= $45,000 + $630,000 + $18,300 - $25,700 - $10,900
= $67,9900
=> Cost of goods sold = Total Goods Available for Sale - ending inventory
= $67,9900 - $64,600
= $61,5300
=> Gross Profit = Net sales - Cost of goods sold
= $760,000 - $61,5300
= $144,700
Hope it will find you well.
Individuals who want to work, but have given up searching for a job because of limited prospects, are known as discouraged workers.
<h3>Who are discouraged workers?</h3>
Discouraged workers are labour who are above 18 years and below 60 years but have given up on ever finding a job and thus are not actively searching for a job.
Discouraged workers are not counted as part of the labour force and they are not considered to be unemployed.
To learn more about unemployment, please check: brainly.com/question/10940465
Answer:
16.59%
Explanation:
We are given the present value of the bonds, their future value and the time, we need to calculate the rate:
FV = PV (1 + rate)ⁿ
- FV = 100,000
- PV = 999.38
- n = 30
100,000 = 999.38 (1 + rate)³⁰
(1 + rate)³⁰ = 100,000 / 999.38 = 100.062
1 + rate = ³⁰√100.062 = 1.1659
rate = 1.1659 - 1 = 0.1659 or 16.59%
Answer:
it was a foreseen party
Explanation:
Key Largo bank would most likely sue Humphrey on the ground that it was a foreseen party. This is because Humphrey(CPA) being an auditor, knew that the audited financial statements are required for a filing with the regulatory body. Moreover, the auditing firm- Humphrey knew about the specific purpose of the audit report including the fact that his or her opinion(report) will will relied upon by other parties hence a foreseen third party for the auditor.
Based on the aforementioned, Key Largo Bank can sue Humphrey because he is aware of the intended purpose of the audit report.
