Explanation:
Due to people not having enough money i feel that everyone should be fee free at there lunches! School is an amazing place where kids learn but not always at homes. some people get abused and hit because of abusive parents.
Some kids need a break and not all families have the money needed to afford school lunches. in any case school's should provide full lunches to any kid that signs up. there should be no reason not to include a free lunch. every parent is already paying there taxes there should be no additional fee.
I also believe all kids even the ones that can already afford this program should be given a lunch. Many kids enjoy the school lunches and would love to have them free. some kids forget there change and or loose it. they may have left it at home or it may have been stolen.
This may sound a little crazy but i also think that each shcool should have at least one professional chef to make the kids nice meals, and so him/her can help the other chefs.
In conclusion i believe all schools in the district should have free lunches, and a pro- Chef!
<span>Whereas prejudice consists of beliefs, and discrimination is characterized by actions.
So, the option B is correct. beliefs; actions
Prejudice is a negative attitude or disposition you have for other people on the basis of race, ethnicity etc
And discrimination is an action or practice or anything what you do.</span>
The answer is aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
The correct answer is C. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment, while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to overfishing
Explanation:
The two passages provide a different about fish farming, which is the practice that involves raising fish rather than capturing them in their natural habitat. In the case of the passage 1, the author proposes fish farming is beneficial because this stops the problem of overfishing, this can be seen in "Fish farming helps humans continue to consume fish while protecting valuable marine resources" that shows fish farming is the way to protect the environment and the populations of fish while benefitting humans.
On the opposite, the author of passage 2 exposes the negative effects of fish farming and in this way shows this is not a solution. This can be seen in "one of the major problems with fish farming is water supply contamination" or in "it also causes destructions to habits" that supports the idea fishing farming does not solve the problems caused by overfishing.
