1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovangra [49]
3 years ago
13

Which civil rights do you think are most important today? Why?

History
1 answer:
e-lub [12.9K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Civil rights are an essential component of democracy. They're guarantees of equal social opportunities and protection under the law, regardless of race, religion, or other characteristics. Examples are the rights to vote, to a fair trial, to government services, and to a public education

Explanation:

:)

You might be interested in
Its attached answer it pls
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

pretty much a golden rule or to keep a balance or... "you do this

and this is your punisment"

5 0
3 years ago
How did the water frame increase textile production​
Marta_Voda [28]
The water frame could operate at a faster rate and therefore produce threads faster and reduce the number of people needed to run the machine
5 0
4 years ago
How did the Supreme Court change as a result of Ronald Reagan’s presindecy ?
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

The Reagan era of the 1980s is often remembered for the President’s pursuit of ending the Cold War and his legacy as the “Great Communicator.” But Reagan’s impact on the Supreme Court was also significant and still relevant today.During his eight years in office, President Reagan elevated a Chief Justice, had three nominations confirmed, one rejected and another nominee withdrawn from consideration in the Senate.

Reagan had signaled a desire to have an influence on the Court during the 1980 presidential campaign, and few will dispute that he did shape the Court’s future through his appointments.

The candidate said he would appoint a woman to the Supreme Court, and he also pledged to reverse the Roe v. Wade decision and any court decision that barred prayers in public schools.

President Reagan made good on his first promise when he nominated Arizona judge Sandra Day O’Connor to the Supreme Court. Reagan personally vouched that O’Connor’s views on abortion would be acceptable to conservatives.

O’Connor was unanimously approved by the Senate in a 99-0 vote on September 21, 1981, with one absent senator personally apologizing to the justice for not being present for the vote.

The rest of Reagan’s history with the Senate nomination process and the Supreme Court wasn’t as smooth. The President then decided to elevate a conservative Justice, William Rehnquist, to the position of Chief Justice in 1986 when Warren Burger retired. Rehnquist overcame liberal opposition in the Senate, and was appointed with a 65-33 vote.

Reagan’s next nomination came when he had to replace Rehnquist as an associate justice and he had two candidates to consider: Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia. He had put both judges on the District Of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court.

After the political debate over Rehnquist elevation to Chief Justice, there was much less political attention given to the eventual nominee: Scalia. Scalia, like O’Connor, received a unanimous confirmation to the Court on the same day that Rehnquist’s elevation was approved, despite having a more conservative record than Rehnquist.

Explanation:

Hope this is what you were looking for

4 0
3 years ago
2. At what age is Carnegie promoted to be manager of the company?
Gala2k [10]

He was 24

"he was hired as a messenger for a local telegraph company, where he taught himself how to use the equipment and was promoted to telegraph operator. With this skill he landed a job with the Pennsylvania Railroad, where he was promoted to superintendent at age 24."

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the text to answer the question.
Alecsey [184]

This excerpt reflects that (c.) the document provides protections for English citizens but does not provide equal protections.

Magna Carta was a document issued in the 13th century and it established that everyone, even the monarch, was subject to the law. It was mainly designed to solve the problems that had arisen between the King and the rebel barons.<u> This excerpt shows that, although the document protects the English citizen that commits an offence, it does not offer the same protection that it offers to the man that belongs the highest class</u> <u>since it establishes that, unlike ordinary citizens, earls and barons can only be judged by people that belong to their same social class</u>. The reason why the document offers unequal protection is because <u>Magna Carta had been designed by the barons to ensure that their own rights were protected</u>.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the great leap forward in china
    15·2 answers
  • Which rhetorical appeal is used here?
    9·2 answers
  • Why was Carnegie Steel able to offer its product more cheaply than its competitors?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was it difficult for Congress to protect the nation from foreign threats under the Articles of Confederation
    5·1 answer
  • True or False.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a reason for increased migration from Latin America?
    8·1 answer
  • How did Louisiana's political leaders respond to the oil bust of the
    7·1 answer
  • Blank rose to power by restoring order in Afghanistan after the war with the Soviet Union
    15·1 answer
  • In Athens, citizens included
    6·2 answers
  • This German painter went to the court of henry viii to paint the most vivid and telling portraits of the royal family
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!