Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The rates are additive: you can calculate the<em> inlet </em>rate and the <em>outlet</em> rate and add them algebraically, i.e. the inlet rate will be positive and the outlet rate will be negative.
<u>1. Inlet rate:</u>
<u />
<u>2. Outlet rate:</u>
<u>3. Net rate:</u>
<u>4. Time to fill the vat</u>
Answer:
10.0328
Step-by-step explanation:
this is the answer
Answer:
Missing co-ordinate for the ordered pair is
Y-intercept is
X-intercept is
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of a certain company's video stores can be approximated by the linear equation
where is the number of stores and represents the number of years after 1990.
To find the missing co-ordinate for the ordered pair solution
For the ordered pair, we are given the value which is =7 i.e 7 years after 1990. Thus we will plugin in the linear equation to get the value which is number of stores after 7 years from 1990.
Thus the ordered pair is
To find y-intercept which is the point where the line touches the y-axis, we would plugin in the equation as the x-coordinate is 0 at y-axis.
Thus y-intercept is at point
To find x-intercept which is the point where the line touches the x-axis, we would plugin in the equation as the y-coordinate is 0 at x-axis and thus for
Subtracting both sides by 4682.
Dividing both sides by -264
∴
Thus x-intercept is at point
9514 1404 393
Answer:
C. (-4, -3)
Step-by-step explanation:
The point where the lines cross is the solution to both equations. That point is in the third quadrant, where both coordinate values are negative.
The x-coordinate of the point is listed first, so the solution is ...
(x, y) = (-4, -3)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(1) 2x - 6y = -12
(2) x + 2y = 14
There is a -6y and a +2y. Since they have opposite signs, I'll try to eliminate the y terms. (That's my choice. There is more than one way to solve these.)
Multiply eq. (2) by 3:
3x + 6y = 42
Then add the result to eq. (1) to eliminate the y terms:
2x - 6y = -12
3x + 6y = 42
------------------
5x = 30, so x = 6
Now plug the value of x into eq. (2) and solve for y:
6 + 2y = 14
2y = 8
y = 4
Why did I use eq. (2) to solve for y? Because it's less work. I could have used eq. (1) instead:
2(6) - 6y = -12
12 - 6y = -12
-6y = -24
y = 4
More than one way to solve.