1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren [92.7K]
3 years ago
6

Pls help pls pls..pls help

History
1 answer:
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

it would be. B second ammendemnt

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Record at least eight examples of how interest groups are good or bad for democracy.
solong [7]
List of Cons of Interest Groups

1. They would often seek for the minority of people. 
Interest groups lead to pluralism, which critics contend that there is no common good, as there are many conflicting interests in society. What is good for one individual can be bad for other people. Critics also argue that interest groups would interfere with democracy, as they seek out benefits for minorities rather than the greater good of the majority. For example, the National Rifle Association has repeatedly blocked gun-control legislations, despite the fact that most citizens in the US actually want stricter laws on firearms.

2. They only have one track in mind. 
As interest groups usually have a single track in mind, they would only think about and look at their personal opinions, and not at those of the majority.

3. They are only effective for themselves. 
Another big argument by critics about these groups is that their system can really be effective only for economic interest groups, which normally have greater financial resources at their disposal. It is also believed that these groups would ignore the interests of the poor in favor of the middle and upper-class, who have more money and time to contribute.

4. They would commit serious crimes. 
According to past news, there are interest groups that have committed serious crimes, such as corruption, bribery, fraud, etc. There are even those who were involved in some cases and accused of giving threats to domestic social orders and extremists.

List of Pros of Interest Groups

1. They use a democratic process. 
Interest groups contribute a helpful democratic process to protect certain individuals as alternative in daunting the majority. Because of this, many people have the freedom to express and speak their suggestions and opinions.

2. They check the power of majorities. 
In the US political system, there exist the principles of democracy, which include the majority rule, but there is also the protection of rights of people who do not belong to the majority. Interest groups, such as those based on gender, ethnic and religious identities, can perform important checks on the powers of the majority.

3. They have the ability to motivate legislators. 
These groups can easily motivate legislators in promulgating their beliefs optimistically.

4. They allow for better representation of interests. 
Members of interest groups and other social movements believe that they should better advance their causes and interests, whether it is protecting civil rights, voting rights and the environment, by uniting themselves for collective action. By doing so, they demonstrate strength in numbers when it comes to politics.

5 0
3 years ago
HOW DID EUROPEAN NATIONS BUILD EMPIRES IN SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA
SIZIF [17.4K]
The primary way in which these nations built empires was through pure destruction. They would come into these small island nations and simply wipe out populations and take control of the government.
7 0
4 years ago
Under what ground Awadh was annexed to British India? Name the then viceroy.​
nlexa [21]

The Doctrine of lapse on the grounds of alleged internal misrule.

  • In 1856 Awadh was annexed to British India.
  • The king of Awadh was Wajid Ali Shah.
  • In 1856 the viceroy of British India was Lord Delhousy.
5 0
3 years ago
Which viewpoint in the narrative passage is included in the expository passage
dezoksy [38]
The viewpoint in the narrative passage that is included in the expository passage is: <span>the power struggle between wealthy owners and the general public,</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What did Thaddeus Kosciusko do? What did Casimir Pulaski do?
tester [92]
They were both from Poland and they both fought in US Independence War. Kościuszko was fighting more in norther part of US, he was famous for building forts. Pułaski fought more on south US, he created first American cavalry. They are still national heroes in Poland.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • John Quincy has been a citizen of United States for eight years he’s 27 years old if John decides to run for Congress what are h
    11·1 answer
  • What is the anser for it
    6·2 answers
  • Who wrote the humorous novel Pantagruel, published in 1532, which poked fun at the established order?
    8·1 answer
  • Which what problem did the colony of Jamestown have because of its location near a swamp?
    6·1 answer
  • Where was the first battle of the war fought and who won it?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was due process included in the Bill of Rights? A.
    5·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was responsible for the introduction of islam into the sahel region?
    14·1 answer
  • In the United States, why were the 1920s known as the Roaring Twenties?
    13·1 answer
  • What are some of the subjects that are focused on under "the Humanities"?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!