The development of fundamental rights protection in the EU

Law

1 answer:

Alika [10]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The 1984 draft treaty establishing the European Union specified that the Union must protect the dignity of the individual and recognize for everyone falling within its jurisdiction the fundamental rights and freedoms derived from the common principles of the national constitutions and the ECHR.]

Make sure to paraphrase this. I got this from the internet.

You might be interested in

What are the fundamental principles of the Faragher v. City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth cases in th

maks197457 [2]

Answer:

B. Employers are not liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of whether the employer is aware of the sexual harassment act.

Explanation:

In this case, the Supreme Court mentioned that an employer isat risk. That means that the empolyer does nor have a defense when sexual harassment by a supervisor involves a tangible employment action. Courts hope that employers educate supervisors so they do not commit any type of behavior that could be considered as sexual harassment. Also, all employees must be educated so as to understand their rights and responsibilities .

8 0

3 years ago

Civil law is further divided into the categories of

e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

it can be divided into two.

substantive law and procedural law

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

which criteria must a law meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate? select all tha

KatRina [158]

The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"

It must further a compelling government interest
It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.

<h3>What is a strict scrutiny test?</h3>

In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.