1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
TEA [102]
3 years ago
11

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion. True or False

Law
1 answer:
nydimaria [60]3 years ago
7 0

The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.

Answer: Option 1

<u>Explanation: </u>

The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.

The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard.  If in the case raised, then the President,  only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.

You might be interested in
Am I legally allowed to own a pet asparagus in alabama<br><br><br>pls help I want a pet asparagus
Alborosie
Yes you can have a pet
4 0
3 years ago
What market forces influence wages?
pashok25 [27]

Answer:The market forces that influence wages are the supply and demand for labor.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would be the best title for this image?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

The Answer is B.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
How would congress check the power of a president who is discovered to be taking bribes?
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

The president can veto a law in the executive branch, but the legislature can override that veto with an adequate vote. The legislature has the power to approve presidential nominations, control budgets, impeach the president and remove him from office.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Do juveniles sufficiently understand Miranda warning and be able to waive their constitutional rights to remain silent or speak
patriot [66]

According to data, it is found that juveniles do not sufficiently understand the Miranda warning and find it difficult to exercise their right of remaining silent.

<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>

Juveniles are far more sensitive than adults are. This is the reason what may not mean coercion in the case of an adult may be considered as coercion in the case having a juvenile involved. According to the data obtained from a number of juvenile justice cases, it is clear that the juveniles do not choose to make use of their right to remain silent.

This may be either because they don't properly come to terms with what Miranda rights actually are or they are too vulnerable to the interrogation and can't resist speaking out of fear.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • My discord is<br><br> #1864<br><br> If anyone wants to friend me
    15·1 answer
  • What is a decision by a judge or jury?<br> Warrant<br> Summons<br> Settlement<br> Verdict
    7·2 answers
  • Clause that says federal laws are superior to state laws. Which clause is this referring to?
    6·1 answer
  • What are methods of seeking legal assistance or guidance in a foreign country?
    10·1 answer
  • What is true about conflicts of interest?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. A person designated by the court whose knowledge exceeds the knowledge of anyone with a
    7·1 answer
  • Alabama permit test
    7·1 answer
  • Is an amount of money paid to the court to ensure that the defendant
    5·2 answers
  • Summarize Arizona v Evans
    14·1 answer
  • (Citizenship 02.05 HC)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!