Ten people put 63 boxes on a red truck and 38 boxes on a blue track About how many boxes did they load in all

What’s the volume of this triangular prism ?

iris [78.8K]

Answer: 157.5

Step-by-step explanation: To get the volume of an object you must multiply the width x height ÷ it by 2 x length

Therefore 7 x 5 = 35 ÷ 2 = 17.5

17.5 x 9 = 157.5

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLZZ HELP ITS AN EMERGENCY THIS IS DUE IN 30 MINUTES!!!

Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

1.equation

2. inverse operations

3. 3.7

4. 8

5. yes its a solution because 58=58

6. not a solution

7. 10.3

9. 9

11. 64

12. 2.1

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose you can somehow choose two people at random who took the SAT in 2014. A reminder that scores were Normally distributed w

Sindrei [870]

Answer:

22.29% probability that both of them scored above a 1520

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples are solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean $\mu$ and standard deviation $\sigma$ , the zscore of a measure X is given by:

$Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}$

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this problem, we have that:

$\mu = 1497, \sigma = 322$

The first step to solve the question is find the probability that a student has of scoring above 1520, which is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 1520.

So

$Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}$

$Z = \frac{1520 - 1497}{322}$

$Z = 0.07$

$Z = 0.07$ has a pvalue of 0.5279

1 - 0.5279 = 0.4721

Each students has a 0.4721 probability of scoring above 1520.

What is the probability that both of them scored above a 1520?

Each students has a 0.4721 probability of scoring above 1520. So

$P = 0.4721*0.4721 = 0.2229$

22.29% probability that both of them scored above a 1520

8 0

2 years ago

Two friends store 3 cereal bors equally. How many cored bors each person get? Show your work Write an equation & solution: E

maria [59]

Answer:

1 $\frac{1}{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

There are a total of 2 friends, if they have 3 cereal bars and want to split it equally then we simply need to divide the number of cereal bars by the number of friends which would give us the number of cereal bars that each individual will get, which will be represented by x

x = 3 / 2

x = 1 $\frac{1}{2}$

Finally, we can see that each friend will get a total of 1 and a half of a cereal bar.

7 0

2 years ago

Starbucks reports net income for 2015 of $2,634.4 million. Its stockholders' equity is $5,605 million and $6,151 million for 201

ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

A. 44.82%

B.

Option b. Return On Equity usually increases since the repurchase of shares reduces the denominator (avg. stockholders' equity)

C.

Option b. The Companies would tend to repurchase their own stock if they feel the stock is been undervalued by the market

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Computation for return on equity for 2015

Using this formula

Return on equity = The Net income amount /The Average stockholders' equity amount

Let plug in the formula

Return on equity=2,634.4/[(5,605+6,151)/2]

Return on equity=2,634.4/(11,756/2)

Return on equity=2,634.4/5,878

Return on equity=0.4482×100

Return on equity= 44.82%

b. In a situation where they repurchased over $1.4 billion of its common stock in the year 2015 this means that the RETURN ON EQUITY will usually tend to increases reason been that the repurchase of shares will often reduces the denominator (average stockholders' equity)

Therefore the repurchase increase Starbucks’ Return On Equity.

c. In a situation where Starbucks had not repurchased common stock in the year 2015, what their Return On Equity would have been is that they will repurchase their own stock if they feel the stock is been undervalued by the market

6 0

3 years ago