They are called bellwether species, also known as sentinel species.
One disadvantage of being apart of a kingdom would be, they had no choice but to pay tribute, another would be that the men has to serve in the king's army.
One advantage was that the king provided protection for the conquered territory, another advantage would be that the armies made sure that the trade routes were safe, they kept out raiders and foriegn armie. Wars between small cities ended.
This is the very first Article.
Article 1 Section 1 says that all legislative powers are given to the congress. Section 2 describes the house and Section 3 the senate. Further sections of Article 1 describe other aspects of the Legislative Branch.
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
1) The student may be unaware of the TRUE, UNDERLYING reason why s/he "misbehaved".
2) The student may provide a response that is not a response that the [asker of the question] would be pleased to hear. (e.g. "because I hate [insert name of the person]. ; or, "because that lesson is boring"; or, "because I'm sick and tired of school."
_________________________________________________
