All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following was not an effect of the Norris LaGuardia Act?

Business

1 answer:

Katena32 [7]3 years ago

7 0

U didn’t put like half the question luv

You might be interested in

The ratio of the number of companies offering both a stock-options incentive and one of the benefits listed to the number of com

Elis [28]

Answer:

D. Tuition

Explanation:

D. Tuition

7 0

3 years ago

In which ways can goals be classified

Sonja [21]

Answer: It says goals can be classified as : futuristic,psychological, or educational (then ) , recreational , occupational, or personal

this is the correct answer

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Akers Company sold bonds on July 1, 20X1, with a face value of $100,000. These bonds are due in 10 years. The stated annual inte

Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

$76,620.83

Explanation:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows

Future Value (FV) = $100,000

Rate of interest = 10% yearly

Rate of interest (Rate) = 10%÷ 2 = 5% semiannually

Number of period (Nper) = 9 × 2 = 18

Face value = $100,000

Payment (pmt) = $100,000 × (6%÷2) = $3,000

By putting the value in excel present value formula, we get,

PV = $76,620.83

Attachment is attached below

6 0

3 years ago

Cash $ 14,000 Accounts payable $ 42,000 Receivables 70,000 Other current liabilities 28,000 Inventories 210,000 Total CL $ 70,00

Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

The ROE will increase by 7.69% to 14.29% from 7.5%

Explanation:

Current liabilities:

account payable 42,000

Other 28,000

Total Liabilities: 70,000

IF we want a current ratio of 2.3 then:

70,000 x 2.3 = 161,000 Current assets are needed.

Right now, the companny has 294,000 current assets so it will make inventories decrease by:

294,000 - 161,000 = 133,000

Then with that will purchase common stock:

280,000 - 133,000 = 147,000 common stock will be outstanding

The Return on equity will be:

21,000 / 147,000 = 0.142857 = 14.29%

While currently the ROE is:

21,000/280,000 = 0.075 = 7.5%

There will be an increase for: 14.29 - 7.5 = 6.79%

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is NOT true concerning the Other Dependent Credit

omeli [17]

Answer:

The incorrect statement is letter "B": Residents of Canada meet the definition as a qualifying person.

Explanation:

Credit for Other Dependent is a tax credit taxpayers can claim for every qualifying dependent that is not considered as a Child Tax Credit (17 years or older and elderly parents). The taxpayer can get up to $500 nonrefundable credit for each of those qualifying dependents. Residents of Canada and Mexico do not meet the definition of qualifying dependent.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers