Help please! Could you explain it too?
1 answer:
Answer:
a) not proportional
b) proportional; k =
Step-by-step explanation:
a) for any proportional equation, the line must pass through the origin. The equation in a) is y = 4x + 1, and the '+1' is the y-intercept. This means that the line does not pass through the origin, so x and y cannot increase by the same amount (i.e. they are not proportional).
Another way to determine this is is to use the y = kx base. If you have an equation that fits that it's likely proportional.
Here, if the equation was only y = 4x then it'd be proportional because u can see that k = 4. This is not the equation though, and the 4x + 1 doesn't fit to the y = kx formula so it can't be proportional.
b) straight away you can see that there's no 'c' term (y = mx + c) which means the y-intercept is 0, so the line passes through the origin. While this does not immediately mean the line is proportional, you can make sure that it is by checking it fits with the y = kx equation.
y = -(3/5)x fits with y = kx, with k being -3/5
You might be interested in
Answer:
see the attachment
Step-by-step explanation:
If the growth is 7 feet in 2 weeks and the rate is constant, then it will be half that in one week, or 3.5 feet per week. At week 3, it will be 3.5 feet more than at week 2. The table below shows this progression.
The point (0, 0) means there was no measurable growth when time was starting to be measured (at week 0).
