All categories

3 years ago

What is the difference between direct e-mailing and spam ?

Business

2 answers:

Nataly_w [17]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: You want direct email spam is what you dont want.

Explanation: Generally, consumers must sign up to receive direct e-mailings and the recipient of the e-mail to opt-out of future mailings. Spam is unsolicited, uninvited, and often it is impossible to opt-out of spam.

Brainlist plz!!!!

blondinia [14]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Generally, consumers must sign up to receive direct e-mailings and the recipient of the e-mail to opt out of future mailings. Spam is unsolicited, uninvited, and often it is impossible to opt out of spam.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A person with anorexia nervosa is likely to Multiple Choice

Elis [28]

Answer:

2. grow up in a perfectionistic home with very high expectations.

Explanation:

1- There is no relation with economic conditions

3- There are no relation with how home is flexible

4- If we check where problem comes from and decided that mother can be the reason then even mother has a healthy body we expect person to be normal.

2- Grow up with very perfectionist and expecting lots of issues then anorexia might occur.

7 0

3 years ago

Identify and describe the basic elements of a safety program

lys-0071 [83]

Hope it helps! ///////////

7 0

3 years ago

Ryan bought a stock three years ago for $6 a share. Today, June 22, the stock is selling for $72 a share. Ryan is afraid that th

dem82 [27]

Answer:

B) Ryan's stock was sold for $9 a share causing him to lose most of his profits.

Explanation:

Stop loss order means the limit the loss to the extent investor has opted. Since Ryan placed a stop loss order at $70, so, when the price of the stock starts at $9, the stock would be sold at $9 because it is the next available price to what he placed a stop loss order.

So, the Answer is Ryan stock is sold for $9 a share causing him to lose most of his profits.

6 0

2 years ago

Suppose an American buys stock issued by an Argentinian corporation. The Argentinian firm uses the proceeds from the sale to bui

faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Policies consistent with the goal of increasing productivity and growth in developing countries are:

1. Protecting property rights and enforcing contracts

2. Providing tax breaks and patents for firms that pursue research and development in health and sciences

Explanation:

To increase productivity and growth in developing countries, it is important that developing countries enhance the mechanisms for protecting property rights and enforcing contracts. These are the bases for attracting more foreign direct investments. The court system should be a system where justice is obtained and a system which can enforce the rights of individuals to own property. Without this basic ingredient, foreign direct investments will be hard to attract.

4 0

3 years ago

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is $16,000, and your total cost of a year of college is $48,000 per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually more than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0

3 years ago