1. Yes. Unfortunately, the role that this privilege plays in society is often to encourage inequality among citizens and not to allow meritocracy to be exercised efficiently.
2. No. The USA promotes and foresees an unequal treatment among citizens, mainly regarding race, origin, social position and heredity of people, which ends up generating a strong social inequality.
3. The US government protects citizens' rights through laws and guidelines that must be followed across the country. However, often these laws only work in theory and people continue to have their rights unprotected, especially citizens who are members of a social minority.
4. No. When our government was created, there was a strong slave culture in the country, which affirmed that whites and blacks were different and should be treated in different ways, where whites were placed as superiors and deserving of all possible social privilege. Furthermore, at the beginning of our government, women were also considered inferior and lived under a system of domination to which men were not subjected.
5. This did not impact the decision of the creators of our government, since they were all white men and did not suffer from the lack of rights and privileges that women and blacks suffered.
They were signers of the Declaration of Independence
I don’t think so. He implies women are only to be wives and mothers, which also implies the old statuses of men working, voting, owning property and women not being allowed to do so. This is not just the Justice’s personal opinion to keep to himself, and he says civil society must be based on the “law of the creator.” Personally, I think his perspective is rubbish
"promote the general welfare" is the statement among the following choices given in the question that is best considered a statement of the public interest. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. I hope that this is the answer that has come to your desired help.
Answer:
El contrato social, como teoría política, explica, entre otras cosas, el origen y el propósito del Estado y de los derechos humanos. La esencia de la teoría (cuya formulación más conocida es la propuesta por Jean-Jacques Rousseau) es la siguiente: para vivir en sociedad, los seres humanos acuerdan un contrato social implícito que les otorga ciertos derechos a cambio de abandonar la libertad de la que dispondría en estado de naturaleza. Siendo así, los derechos y los deberes de los individuos constituyen las cláusulas del contrato social, en tanto que el Estado es la entidad creada para hacer cumplir el contrato. Del mismo modo, los seres humanos pueden cambiar los términos del contrato si así lo desean; los derechos y los deberes no son inmutables o naturales. Por otro lado, un mayor número de derechos implica mayores deberes, y menos derechos, menos deberes.
Explanation:
