Answer:
1. m<T =72 , m<U =54
2. EF= 18 in. , m<F=134'
3. x=4
Step-by-step explanation:
1. <s=<u , there is 180' in a triangle total so 180- <S - <U = <T
180 - 54 - 54 = 72
2. ef = gf
180 - 23 - 23 = 134
3. since bottom 2 angles are = , the 2 sides are also =
see attachment for work
keeping in mind that perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slopes, hmmm what's the slope of the equation above anyway?
![\bf y = \cfrac{2}{3}x\implies y = \stackrel{\stackrel{m}{\downarrow }}{\cfrac{2}{3}}x+0\qquad \impliedby \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} slope-intercept~form\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y=\underset{y-intercept}{\stackrel{slope\qquad }{\stackrel{\downarrow }{m}x+\underset{\uparrow }{b}}} \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20y%20%3D%20%5Ccfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7Dx%5Cimplies%20y%20%3D%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Cstackrel%7Bm%7D%7B%5Cdownarrow%20%7D%7D%7B%5Ccfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7Dx%2B0%5Cqquad%20%5Cimpliedby%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7B%7Cc%7Cll%7D%20%5Ccline%7B1-1%7D%20slope-intercept~form%5C%5C%20%5Ccline%7B1-1%7D%20%5C%5C%20y%3D%5Cunderset%7By-intercept%7D%7B%5Cstackrel%7Bslope%5Cqquad%20%7D%7B%5Cstackrel%7B%5Cdownarrow%20%7D%7Bm%7Dx%2B%5Cunderset%7B%5Cuparrow%20%7D%7Bb%7D%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Ccline%7B1-1%7D%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill)

so we're really looking for the equation of a line whose slope is -3/2 and runs through (0,0).

A positive one because the nagatives cancel out
Answer:
x-7>0
Straight answer: x-7
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that the timber is X cm long and 7cm was cut off, there remaining amount is x - 7cm. In order for 7cm to be cut off, the timber must have been > 7cm long => x > 7 => x - 7 > 0
Answer:
Therefore, we conclude that the statement in (A) is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the following sentences:
A) If the probability of an event occurring is 1.5, then it is certain that event will occur.
B) If the probability of an event occurring is 0, then it is impossible for that event to occur.
We know that the range of probability of an event occurring is in the segment [0, 1]. In statement under (A), we have the probability that is equal to 1.5.
Therefore, we conclude that the statement in (A) is incorrect.