Since the tower is repainted every seven years, then, the number of times it has been painted is 19 times.
Let understand that the tower in question is the Eiffel Tower.
- The Eiffel Tower was built in Paris, France to be a main attractions in the Country's capital in 1889.
- Now, the number of years between year 1889 and 2022 is 133 years.
- The question is "If the tower is repainted every seven years"
The number of time painted = 133 years / 7 years
The number of time painted = 19 time.
In conclusion, since the tower is repainted every seven years, then, the number of times it has been painted is 19 times.
Read more about Eiffel Tower
<em>brainly.com/question/82033</em>
Answer:
Georgia- a place for imprisoned debtors and convicts
Explanation:
The colonial settlement that is correctly paired with the reason it was founded is option A.
The Georgia colony settled was originally intended to be a refuge for imprisoned London debtors by James Oglethorpe.
The other options are not correctly paired and are thus incorrect.
Answer:
James Otis was called the most
important American of the 1760s by John Adams.. During the 1760s, Otis led the intellectual attack against British tyranny, composing ringing defenses of liberty that won Americans to the revolutionary cause and helped to inspire the well-known slogan, "No taxation without representation."
<span>It’s become ever clearer that the US is the sole superpower. In the early 90s one could still talk of a Russo-American partnership, but that has become unrealistic, except in a very limited sense, as Russia continued to decline in the 1990s. The rising powers are not in a position to challenge the United States.</span>
Answer: Secondary historical sources.
Explanation:
Two types of sources, primary and secondary, have generally been represented in history. The primary sources are artefacts, documents, records, and other raw, source material, and they serve primarily as a source of information for the historian.
Secondary sources include quotes, comments and the like. For many historians, secondary sources create problems, they may be useful, but they need to be correctly interpreted. Because of their form, they are subject to change (because the quotation can be distorted over time and get another meaning), so they should be carefully handled. Therefore, they are distrustful of context and unreliable for proof.