Occur if not for the bomb, taking more lives than the bomb would.
The deputy governor can interpret the law, determine its constitutionality and apply it to individual cases in the supreme court.
<h3>
What is a Supreme court?</h3>
- The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States.
- It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court actions and state court actions, including points of federal law.
- It also has its own jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, in particular "all cases involving ambassadors, other ministers of public service and consuls, and cases in which a State is said to be a party."
- The Court has powers of judicial review and has the power to find laws that violate any provision of the Constitution.
- It can also revoke executive orders that violate the Constitution or applicable law.
- However, it may only act in connection with matters within the area of law for which it has jurisdiction.
- The courts have ruled that they can adjudicate cases that have political implications, but that they have no authority to adjudicate unjustifiable political issues.
Thus, the deputy governor can interrupt the case in between and can appeal in the supreme court.
To know more about supreme court refer to:
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer:
Paul Kagame
Explanation:
Paul Kagame is the current and 4th president of Rwanda. The 1st president was Grégoire Kayibanda.
Paul Kagame has been president for the past 20 years taking office in the year 2000
Answer:
The best answer to the question: In his essay: "The Laboring Classes" Orestes Brownson argued that:___, would be, C: Wealth and labor were at war.
Explanation:
"The Laboring Classes" is an essay that was written by American author Orestes A. Brownson and it was first published in the Boston Quarterly Review, in 1840. The essay is a text that Brownson published before his conversion into Catholicism in 1844 and it is a pretty powerful critique to the effects that capitalism has had on the living conditions of laborers. Although he mentions the effects of Chartism, a series of legislations that were passed in England in 1837, and savagely critiques certain social movements, especially when it comes to laborers and social equality, in the end he shows that the labor movements, and social instability present not just in England, but in other parts of the world, comes mostly from the difficult situations that laborers are having to face in the world order of his day, while business owners ignored the welfare of their workers for the sake of incrementing their gain. This is why the answer is C.
