For the first part:Every shirt she grabs, will cost her dollars, so if she grabs 3 shirts, then the cost of the shirts is:

With the same rationale, if she grabs 2 pairs of jeans, the cost of the jeans is:

So, her total is:

If you subtract 3 from the total, then the expression is:
For the second part:If she's paying 3 less for each shirt, then the cost of 3 shirts will become:

In the same fashion, for the two jeans:

So the expression for the total cost is:
For number three:The amounts are different because the cost of the total purchase is different than the cost of each element that makes up the total purchase.
For number four:If you're the owner, you want to give the smallest amount of discount (the one in part 1/a).
So you could clarify by saying there's 3 dollars of the TOTAL purchase's cost.
(2n+1)(2n-1)(n+5)
=(4n^2+2n-2n-1)(n+5)
=(4n^2-1)(n+5)
=4n^3-n+20n^2-5
4n^3+20n^2-n-5
Answer:
range {1,3,-3,4,1} yes that is it
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-1 < x < 2
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph indicates the variable may take on values between -1 and 2, not including those values. The compound inequality is written ...
-1 < x < 2
1627190 there's your answer.