1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
luda_lava [24]
3 years ago
6

PART B: Which TWO phrases from the text best support the answers to Part A? A. “‘You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher.’”

(Paragraph 10)
B. “Where there are pistol shots, there are men.” (Paragraph 39)
C. "hunting had ceased to be what you call ‘a sporting proposition.’ It had become too easy. I always got my quarry.’” (Paragraph 94)
D. “‘One does not expect nowadays to find a young man of the educated class, even in America, with such a naïve, and, if I may say so, mid-Victorian point of
view.’” (Paragraph 116)
E. “‘Civilized? And you shoot down men?’” (Paragraph 128)
F. “General Zaroff had an exceedingly good dinner in his great paneled dining hall that evening.” (Paragraph 199)
English
1 answer:
Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
5 0

I have looked this question up to find what Part A is about. What I found is about the central themes in the story, which refer to (1) violence becoming a common thing and, for that reason, not being taken seriously, and (2) humankind's obligation to act with reason instead of acting in an animal-like manner.

With that in mind, we can answer:

Answer:

The two phrases from the text which best support the answer to Part A are:

C. "hunting had ceased to be what you call 'a sporting proposition.' It had become too easy. I always got my quarry." (Paragraph 94)

E. "Civilized? And you shoot down men?" (Paragraph 128)

Explanation:

"The Most Dangerous Game" is a short story by Richard Connell. The protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff, are skilled hunters who face each other in a deadly conflict.

Both characters have a distorted view of violence. They both show little or no respect for their preys, their game. However, Rainsford only hunts animals and, since he believes they are beasts incapable of feeling or thinking much, he does not see his ruthlessness as a problem.

Zaroff, on the other hand, hunts men. He too sees his preys as beasts - the men he hunts are men he considers inferior to himself. However, he admits that they have the ability to reason, which is precisely why he hunts them. It makes the chase more difficult, more exciting.

<u>As we can see, violence has become common in the life of both characters. But General Zaroff has gone one step further. Rainsford is still able to act in a civilized manner, respecting his fellow human beings. Option E is a line spoken by him, questioning Zaroff's idea of civilization. On the other hand, option C is a line spoken by Zaroff, which shows that he has given in to his desire for violence.</u>

You might be interested in
Does the author from and then there were none think the deaths were by degree of murder
andrew11 [14]
Your ? dont make sense
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which word correctly fills in the blank?
Otrada [13]
Katniss finally realized she has “a kind of POWER”she never knew she possessed, which gives her an inner strength
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I plan to try out for the play, but I only want the lead role.<br> simple<br> compound<br> complex
tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

compound

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
In "The Piece of String," the story would be very different if told from the point of view of the farm hand who actually found t
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Summary:

In “The Piece of String,” the story would be very different if told from

the point of view of the farm hand who actually found the wallet. He

would most likely be shocked and concerned that the old man was taking

such grief for something he did not do. It also would have changed the

end of the story.

This is More Detailed:

Maitre Malandain probably does not truly believe that Maitre Hauchcorne has stolen the wallet, but having "the tendency to hold grudges," he takes advantage of an opportunity to deal misery to his foe.

Just as Saki satirized those of the Edwardian Age in England, Guy de Maupassant mocked the pettiness of the peasantry of Normandy, a province in northwestern France. In the exposition of his story, Maupassant describes the Norman women in the market who stubbornly held to their prices in the market and would only relent when a customer began to walk away. Then, they would shout after him or her, "All right...It's yours."

It is this same obstinate and petty...

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement BEST explains the author’s perspective on online brain training in the text “Is Online Brain Training Actually E
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer: c

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does understanding the characteristics of public speaking affect how you view a speech?
    10·1 answer
  • The cat for the puppies playing in the garden simple complex compound <br>​
    14·1 answer
  • Among the northern andean countries strongly involved in the illegal coca and drug trade.nvolved in illegal coca and drug trade
    11·1 answer
  • How are allegory of the cave and Frankenstein similar
    6·1 answer
  • What is the central idea of this passage?
    9·1 answer
  • Read Fatima’s paragraph.
    11·2 answers
  • Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    6·2 answers
  • Give some explanation for (have had) combine grammar​
    7·2 answers
  • Just as two colors will, when carefully mixed, form a third and different color (yellow and blue, for example, produce green), s
    6·1 answer
  • I will give brainliest But please help!!
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!