Answer:
The answer is: $4,522
Explanation:
Since Stanford doesn't operate in the restaurant business and doesn't buy the restaurant, he cannot deduct any amount for investigation costs relating to the restaurant.
Stanford doesn't operate in the bakery business but he bought the bakery, so he can deduct up to $5,000 (before amortization) for investigation costs related to the bakery. But those $5,000 are reduced by every dollar he spent over $50,000, so he can only deduct $4,000 [= $5,000 - ($51,000 - $50,000)].
The remaining $47,000 (= $51,000 - $4,000) can be amortized over 180 months, which equals $261 per month (= $47,000 / 180 months).
Since he bought the restaurant in November, he can deduct two months: $261 per month x 2 months = $522
So his total deduction for investigation expenses is = $4,000 + $522 = $4,522
Answer:
B) 1,160.
Explanation:
First we must calculate planned aggregate expenditures (PAE) and then determine where Y = PAE:
PAE = consumption + planned investment + government spending + net exports = 100 + 0.75(Y - 40) + 50 + 150 +20 = 100 + 0.75Y - 30 + 50 + 150 + 20 = 290 + 0.75Y
Now we must determine where Y and PAE intercept:
Y = 290 + 0.75Y
Y - 0.75Y = 290
0.25Y = 290
Y = 290 / 0.25 = 1,160
*Planned aggregate expenditure = total planned spending, it differs from GDP because GDP includes unplanned investment.
PAE = C + Ip + G + NX while GDP = C + I + G + NX
I think the better one is D.
Answer:
The degree of wealth and material comfort available to a person or community.
Explanation:
How nice the way they live their life is
