Answer:
a)Brett has a cause of action against Warson's Diner for retaliatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about Brett, the manager at Warson’s Diner, who plans to promote Keisha, one of the waitresses, to the position of an assistant manager. We are also told that the owner, being racially biased, prevents him from doing so and in the end , Brett gets fired
What holds true in this scenario described above is that Brett has a cause of action against Warson's Diner for retaliatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Is a law, of Act of 1964 that oversee any form of discrimination against employee of an organization and shield them from been discriminated because of race they belong to, their sex , their National origin an so on . The law doesn't only forbid discrimination that is intentional, but all actions that speak discrimination wether intentional or not.
Answer:
b) product differentiation
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the competitive strategy that Hueblue software is implementing is known as product differentiation. This strategy focuses on making sure that the product that a particular company offers is unique and different from it competitor's products in order to make it more desired by a particular target market. Which is what Hueblue is doing by developing motion-control-enabled games which it's competitors do not have.
Answer: to a Director of Management Information Systems.
If Marianne, the payroll manager at Johnson manufacturing wants to upgrade the department's accounting systems, the person whom she would make the most sense to send her request for an upgrade is to a Director of Management Information Systems.
A Management information systems<span> (MIS) director contributes to growth in companies by improving information technology activities and computer resources. They also manage technical departments within an organization and ensure data is available, accurate and secure.</span>
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
<span>"The smallest deed is better than the greatest intention"
Here's my look on this saying:
Many of people, including myself have talked about our great intentions to impact somebody or some place. We might intend to do something, but forget about the importance of following through with those intentions. It is far better to make time to complete small good deeds than to spend your time talking about what you will do “one day.” This can be brought back to the quote, "No deed is too small the be appreciated". No matter how much good we intend to do, it will never compare, in all actuality, to how much good we actually do.
Thank you for your question! I hope this helped! Have an amazing day! :D
</span>