1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
2 years ago
12

Douglas MacArthur authored the Japanese constitution establishing a constitutional monarchy. What is the best description of the

impact of the Japanese constitution on gov. today?
History
1 answer:
slega [8]2 years ago
3 0

douglas impact constitution

The progressive constitution granted universal suffrage, stripped Emperor Hirohito of all but symbolic power, stipulated a bill of rights, abolished peerage, and outlawed Japan's right to make war. ... MacArthur was a gifted administrator, and his progressive reforms were for the most part welcomed by the Japanese people.

japanese constitution impact

The Constitution was mostly drafted by American authors. A few Japanese scholars reviewed and modified it. Much of the drafting was done by two senior army officers with law degrees: Milo Rowell and Courtney Whitney, although others chosen by MacArthur had a large say in the document.

You might be interested in
Describe the conflicts that have arisen between those who claim first amendment rights and those who are in favor of sedition la
statuscvo [17]
This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced. 

Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied. 
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld. 
6 0
3 years ago
50 POINTS HELP ASAP BRAINLIEST
Aneli [31]

1. It depends on the issue at hand. It is likely going to be in federal district court as Federal District Courts are most often the court of original jurisdiction. A is likely the right answer.

2. Both are appellate courts, so D is correct. The Supreme Court and the Appellate Courts are both, most of the time, sitting in a review capacity. SO, they are reviewing the lower court's ruling for errors.

3. A, C, D.

The Supreme Court is the only entity that can issue a writ of cert allowing a case to be heard by the Supreme Court. Appellate Courts can decide that the lower courts were right (A) or wrong (C) and can send the case back down for more information (D).

4. B

A is incorrect as appellate courts do not hear new facts. A prudent attorney will get all factual matters into the "record" for consideration on appeal. This is one of the key uses of objections.

B is correct as a case will often be put on appeal if a lawyer or client feels that the course was not heard "correctly"

C is incorrect as magistrate judges do not hear cases on appeal

D is incorrect as new evidence is not introduced or reintroduced into the record.

5. C is correct as the President nominates Judges and the Senate provides advise and consent. The majority vote rule is new as of the last decade.

6. B and D are correct

7. A is correct. The Supreme Court is the highest appeals court in the land and their job is to hear and rule on cases.

8. C is the correct answer

9. B is the correct answer. Marbury v. Madison established judicial review.

10. D is the correct answer. Brown v. Board set in motion the desegregation of America's schools.

11. B. The Supreme Court can find a law unconstitutional, ending its application and enforceability

12. C is correct. The Supreme Court hears cases on appeal and issues a writ of cert

13. A is correct. Stare Decisis means letting the decision stand in latin and refers to the principle of following legal precedent.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If both houses _____ the bill, it goes to the ____?
Alik [6]
If both houses deny the bill, it goes to the Supreme Court.
6 0
3 years ago
Which are most closely related to biotechnology?
umka21 [38]

Answer:  A. medicine and agriculture

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Who knows the benefit of carrots
GrogVix [38]

Explanation:

carrots are particularly good source of Beta carotene , fibre, vitamin K, potassium and antioxidants. carrots have a number of health benefits. they are weight lose friendly food and have been linked to lower cholesterol levels and improved eye health .

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name of the area in green (3) in the early-1800s?
    12·2 answers
  • If the length of the side of a cube is doubled, then the volume is multiplied by what
    13·1 answer
  • What were johnson's major domestic achievements, and why did they come to be overshadowed?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the outcome of Spanish-American War affect people of Cuba and Puerto Rico?
    10·1 answer
  • Should big businesses like Walmart, Amazon, Home Depot, be allowed to influence political and social success for a state and nat
    7·1 answer
  • 9. How does the myth of the west compare with reality? ​
    14·1 answer
  • Pls help me with this
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these phrases best defines the word “consumerism”?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the southern states feel they had no choice but to succeed?
    14·1 answer
  • Which action fulfills an obligation of citizenship rather than a responsibility?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!