and . So we have a remainder of
and . Subtracting this from the previous remainder gives a new remainder
and . Subtracting this from the previous remainder gives a new one of
and we're done since 2 does not divide . So we have
Answer:
A. The solutions are .
B. The factored form of the quadratic expression
Step-by-step explanation:
A. To find the solutions to the quadratic equation you must:
The solutions are:
B. Two expressions are equivalent to each other if they represent the same value no matter which values we choose for the variables.
To factor :
First, multiply the constant in the polynomial by where is equal to -1.
Since both terms are perfect squares, factor using the difference of squares formula
Answer=36inches tall
Explanation= 44+10= 54
90-54=36in
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
Answer:
y = 2x - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is
y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )
Calculate m using the slope formula
m =
with (x₁, y₁ ) = A(4, 7) and (x₂, y₂ ) = B(2,3)
m = = = 2 , thus
y = 2x + c ← is the partial equation
To find c substitute either of the 2 points into the partial equation
Using (2, 3), then
3 = 4 + c ⇒ c = 3 - 4 = - 1
y = 2x - 1 ← equation of line