Its true
It will never bring development because you will never have an agreement. You need to have the same purpose so you can work together and have some progress. But it can also be wrong because what if you have two teams working on different projects? Your teams have a disagreement, but both are developing different solutions to the same problem. Still developing but with a different idea. It all depends on your perspective.
Answer: Central route to persuasion
Explanation: In this case, the presenter used a central route to persuasion, so he cited information from the content itself, pointing to the benefits of a potentially profitable investment. The presenter did not hide the possibility of great risk, but this is why this is an example of a central persuasion route, since listing all the content directly, without any peripheral routes, and outlined the advantages and risks, managed to persuade potential customers to invest their money. Although all cards are on the table, both potential profit and risk, the information presented by the presenter is strong and convincing, the topic has interested the audience with its strength and relevant information, which can, as in this case, persuade the customers decisively even though there is a risk.
Answer:
Extinction.
Explanation:
Extinction is a process of weakening the appropriate behavior of the person as he/she behaved previously.
Kathy's teacher didn't teach her not to behave like this and ultimately she increased her way of behaving towards the classmates which are called Extinction.
For example, if we are teaching our dog to shake hands with the people but after some time if we are not admiring him or else we are stopping to ask for the shake hand, we are weakening his way of conditioned behavior.
So finally Extinction stops us to make improvements in our unusual behavior.
Answer: Tensions started to rise, and a patriot crowd assaulted a British loyalist in Boston in February 1770, killing a youngster when he shot a rifle at them. Brawls between colonists and British soldiers continued over the next few days, culminating in the Boston Massacre.
Explanation:
The British Parliament adopted rigorous measures for the collection of revenue taxes in the colonies in 1767, in an attempt to recuperate the great money lost in the defense of its North American colonies during the French and Indian War (1754–63). Those responsibilities were part of a set of four legislation known as the Townshend Acts, which were meant to impose Parliament's power over the colonies, in contrast to the British government's policy of salutary neglect in the early to mid-eighteenth century. Many colonists in Massachusetts were outraged when such tariffs were imposed on lead, glass, paper, paint, and tea when they arrived in colonial ports. The colonial response included harassment of British officials and vandalism, in addition to planned boycotts of particular items.
