Answer:
Occupy movement could be explained through Durkheimn's Functionalism theory and Karl Marx's Conflict theory.
Studying collective behavior it could be stated that there is a collective conscience that condemns and punishes Occupy's actions and behaviors. Due to they could be considered deviant or criminal, offending this collective conscience, Durkheim would consider the Occupy movement as a "social fact". The movement would support Durkheim's theory as a social force because it is external to the individual.
This collective conscience can evolve to organic solidarity, and in the long run, there could be anomie, while the whole society no longer supports a collective consciousness in favor of what Wall Street stands for.
This change in collective conscience could be reflected in education, due to there would not be a single and unique collective conscience taught to all the students. This organic process derived from the division of labor is also shown on a full-range diversity of interests and, therefore, of interdependent students alienated from each other with singular perspectives about the Occupy movement.
Marx would support the last phenomenon as an example of a society splitting up into hostile classes facing each other. Alienation could be referred to as several students isolated from their society and competing among themselves. Another result of alienation is false consciousness, where beliefs, ideals or ideologies are not in the person's own best interest. These beliefs, ideas or ideologies are also present in an educational proposal that may not fit the individual's interests.
<span>Some criticisms of Carl Roger's theory are:
- He considers that parents must show unconditional approval to their children, however, there are children with very harmful behaviors to whom approval cannot be shown.
- His concept of human nature is that it always tends to good and healthy, and it has been proven that this is not always the case.
- Considers that a relationship of unconditional positive respect should be shown in the therapeutic relationship, but there has been a lot of criticism if the therapists can or should do it in all cases. <span>For example, with very aggressive patients.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
inanity
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Cooper should have paid more attention to the inanity of the site. This term refers to nonsensical remarks or actions. This is because if he would have looked at the site more in depth, he would have seen lots of these nonsensical remarks and eventually realized it was a fiction-writing site before posting the article.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
