After France surrendered to Germany in June 1940 two members of congress introduced the "Selective Service and Training Act," since it became clear to many that the US would likely have to join the war.
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Answer:
Their wealth came from international trade routes we call the silk roads, connecting European and Asian markets thanks to the massive Mongol Empire that opened up Eurasian trade.
Explanation:
<u>Hope</u><u> </u><u>it's</u><u> </u><u>help</u>
<u>ILY</u>
At the beginning <span>the motivations for European exploration and conquest was to spread their religion, Christianity. However, later on, it became more about imperialism and wealth. </span>
He suggested that stalin should not be his successor but he ended up being anyway
