Answer: D. Russia
Explanation: Hope it helps :)
Explanation:
To start with, the statement - “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” is known as the establishment clause.
The clause prohibits government from making laws that respect the establishment of religion. It also prohibits government from establishing an official religion as well as initiating actions that serve to favour a particular religion over another.
From the provisions of the clause, it is obvious that government is meant to remain neutral to all religions as the clause requires that government should neither respect, elevate nor favour religions.
It is important to note here that provisions of the establishment clause define the concept of separation of church and state. In other words, they are connected and communicate the same message.
The summary of the message is that the church and government are separate entities. As such, the state or government ought not to do things that show support for a particular religion.
Neither is it for proper for the state to compel citizens to be steadfast with, or practise a particular religion because it would amount to violation of citizens rights to religious liberty.
He does not support the annexation of the Philippines. ... He means if the Filipinos begin to read the constitution and declaration, they'll figure out the United States had contradicted their statements regarding their liberty and independence.
Answer:
B. both supported a republican form of government
Explanation:
In The republican form of government, the citizens have the ability to influence the government decisions because members of the government are the representatives that selected by the citizens.
Both anti-Federalist and The Federalist supported this form of government. Their main disagreement is revolved around how much power the central government should have over the states.
The federalist wanted the central government to have huge power/influence over the states. The anti-federalist wanted the opposite.
In the Battle of Waterloo in 1815.
