1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nadya [2.5K]
3 years ago
14

Give the property that justifies each step.

Mathematics
1 answer:
frosja888 [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Please check the explanation below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Some of the properties are defined as:

  • <em>Distributive property</em>

a(b+c) = ab+ac

For example,

suppose a=3, b=4, c=5

3(4+5) = 3(4) + 3(5)

3(9) = 12+15

27 = 27

  • <em>Subtraction property of Equality</em>

if (a=b), then a-c = b-c

For example,

suppose a=2, b=2, c=5

if a = b ⇒ 2 = 2

then a-c = b-c ⇒ 2-5 = 2- 5 ⇒ -3 = -3

  • <em>Addition property of Equality</em>

if (a=b), then a+c = b+c

For example,

suppose a=2, b=2, c=5

if a = b ⇒ 2 = 2

then a+c = b+c ⇒ 2+3 = 2+3  ⇒ 5 = 5

  • <em>Multiplicative property of Equality</em>

if (a=b), then a×c = b×c

For example,

suppose a=2, b=2, c=5

if a = b ⇒ 2 = 2

then a×c = b×c ⇒ 2×5 = 2 × 5  ⇒ 10 = 10

  • <em>Division property of Equality</em>

if (a=b), then a÷c = b÷c

For example,

suppose a=2, b=2, c=5

if a = b ⇒ 2 = 2

then a÷c = b÷c ⇒ 2÷5 = 2 ÷ 3  ⇒ 2/5 = 2/5

Let us solve the given equation using the above properties.

7n-16=47                     Given

7n-16+16=47+16   1) Addtion property of Equality ∵ if (a=b), then a+c = b+c

7n=63                  2) simplify

n = 9                    3) Division property of Equality ∵ if (a=b), then a÷c = b÷c        

You might be interested in
Clarinex is a drug used to treat asthma. In clinical tests of this drug, 1655 patients were treated with 5- mg doses of Clarinex
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.021 -0.012}{\sqrt{\frac{0.012(1-0.012)}{1655}}}=3.363  

p_v =P(z>3.363)=0.00039  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.01 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is significantly higher than 0.012 (1.2%)

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=1655 represent the random sample taken

\hat p=0.021 estimated proportion of interest

p_o=0.012 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.01 represent the significance level

Confidence=99% or 0.99

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that true proportions is higher than 0.012.:  

Null hypothesis:p \leq 0.012  

Alternative hypothesis:p > 0.012  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.021 -0.012}{\sqrt{\frac{0.012(1-0.012)}{1655}}}=3.363  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.01. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(z>3.363)=0.00039  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.01 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is significantly higher than 0.012 (1.2%)

3 0
3 years ago
Plz help :/
Paul [167]

Answer:

1\2

Step-by-step explanation:

draw a circle split it where there are 6 slices color half red and white now color one of the slices green and the rest blue there are 2 slices out of 6 colored blue. Hope it helped! make sure to reduce

6 0
3 years ago
What is 12/3 as an improper fraction?
ella [17]
If it is 1 2/3 it is 5/3. if it is 12/3 it is already a improper factor.<span />
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the football concessions stand, Tia sold 78 hamburgers and chicken tenders. If she
Murrr4er [49]

I am going to do this problem with more of an algebraic approach weather or not its the way your teacher wants you to do it like this.

The way to do things algebraically is to just set variables for what you want to find and set up equations to represent each sentence.

As seen there are hamburgers and chickens in this problem. So let's set the numbers of hamburgers to x, and the numbers of chickens to y.

Now write out each sentence using variables.

1.) Tia sold 78 hamburgers and chicken tenders.

x+y=78

2.) If she sold 24 more hamburgers than chicken tenders.

x=y+24

Now that we have the 2 equations, its time to solve.

Since we have x=y+24, we can replace the x in the first equation with the second equation

y+24+y=78

2y+24=78

Now we can subtract 24 from both sides.

2y=54

Simplify

y=27

Solve for x

x=27+24=51

Done!

6 0
2 years ago
Find the similarity ratio and the ratio of perimeters for two regular octagons with areas of 18in2 and 50in2
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

3. 3 : 5; 3: 5

Step-by-step explanation:

First, let's find the leght of the sides of each octagon.

A= 18in^{2}

The area of an octagon is defined by

A=2(1+\sqrt{2})l^{2}

Replacing the area

18=2(1+\sqrt{2})l^{2}\\\frac{18}{2(1+\sqrt{2})} =l^{2}\\l=\sqrt{\frac{18}{3.4} } \approx 2.3 \ in

Therefore, the side of the first octagon is 1.6 inches long.

Its perimeter is: P=8(2.3in)=18.4in

A=50 in^{2}

50=2(1+\sqrt{2})l^{2}\\\frac{50}{2(1+\sqrt{2})} =l^{2}\\l=\sqrt{\frac{50}{3.4} } \approx 3.8 \ in

Therefore, the side of the second octagon is 3.8 inches long.

Its perimeter is P=8(3.8in)=30.4in.

Now, let's divide to find each ratio:

\frac{3.8}{2.3} \approx 1.65 (the ratio between sides).

\frac{30.4}{18.4} \approx 1.65 (the ratio between perimeters).

Therefore, the closest ratio is 3. 3 : 5; 3: 5

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain how you would use equivalent fractions to solve 0.5 + 0.10
    15·2 answers
  • An advertisement claims a car can go from zero to 60 in 5 seconds. what is the rate of change of the car's speed?
    10·1 answer
  • The graph of a system of inequalities is shown.
    10·2 answers
  • Roberto wants to estimate the answer to this problem to see if his answer is reasonable.
    5·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE HAVING BAD DAY
    11·2 answers
  • Write two subtraction equations to show 15-7.
    11·1 answer
  • Which one should I choose my brain cells dont exist at this point.
    14·1 answer
  • ANSWER QUICKLY..
    6·1 answer
  • Solve for x: 4(3 - 2x) = 2(10 - 8x) Type only your solution, do not type x = *
    12·1 answer
  • Please help me plsssssss! asappp. I'll mark brainlest and give points ​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!