Because such people have their mind sets that they can never be wrong.
Explanation:
Infallibility is something when a person doesn't feel himself wrong. This happens when people have their minds set that they are always right and the other person engaged in the argument with them is wrong, and there is nothing wrong with them. It is actually the inability of themselves to sense their selves wrong.
No one can be infallible. Every human is fallible. So one considering himself fallible is totally wrong. It might happen sometimes that people are right in an argument, but it does not matter that they would always be right. They can be gone wrong sometimes.
It is heard and seen in our daily lives that in an argument with a person who thinks himself infallible, the other person usually says that it is better to keep quiet now, as i know you are never going to consider yourself at mistake.
So it is totally a wrong practice.
Learn more about some concept and example of infallibility at:
brainly.com/question/9196130
#LearnWithBrainly
The answer is: no, because they were not democratic
The soviet union was notoriously known for adopting an authoritarian state as its form of government.
They put total control on the media, preventing anyone from voicing negative opinion about the government. They also utilize their military to execute activists who threaten government reputation. such actions heavily contradict the democratic value that held by members of European union.
As pol. & econ. power following their conquest of Constantinople in 1453, became 1 of largest emps. in historyWhere was Ottoman Empire?<span>Orig. developed in Asia Minor, expanded by conq. territories in SW Asia, Balk. Penin, & N. Africa</span>
<span>For Jefferson, the basic elements of the argument for separation lie in a lack of respect. Jefferson frames the argument that the violation of economic and political rights that the Colonists have had to suffer were the result of a lack of respect. Jefferson is emphatic in how the British government has refused to "assent" to the basic principles of dignity and decency that could enable a successful relationship and partnership to develop. For Jefferson, the critical argument that makes rebellion and dissolution absolute is that this lack of respect will not depart. As long as this imbalance exists, the Colonists will be treated in a secondary manner, denying them their full voice and activation of their rights. It is in this light where I think Jefferson's key arguments lie. In the second section regarding the "Grievances" that the Colonists have borne, Jefferson outlines all that has been done. In doing so, he solidifies his initial argument that separation from Great Britain is the only path that the Colonists can pursue. The relationship between both nations has been so degraded by a lack of respect that there is no other option.
rephrase this in your own words</span>
With pure democracy, he means a system in which every citizen votes directly for laws, and, with republic, he intends a society in which citizens elect a small body of representatives who then vote for laws.
